Click here. In the video A British Passport Doesn't Make You British produced by Freedom Watch GB, a representative from the youth initiative debates the definition of British national identity [00:00]. The core of the argument presented by the speaker is that being British is not merely a legal status conferred by holding a passport, but requires a "collective ancestry" rooted in the British Isles [00:10]. When challenged by a British-born interviewer whose parents were also born in the UK, the speaker maintains that legal citizenship ("on paper") differs from ancestral belonging [02:10]. Bringing the history of Cheddar Man and ancient genetics into this discussion highlights the scientific complexities surrounding concepts of "collective ancestry" and "indigenous" British identity

 


 



In the video A British Passport Doesn't Make You British produced by Freedom Watch GB, a representative from the youth initiative debates the definition of British national identity [00:00]. The core of the argument presented by the speaker is that being British is not merely a legal status conferred by holding a passport, but requires a "collective ancestry" rooted in the British Isles [00:10]. When challenged by a British-born interviewer whose parents were also born in the UK, the speaker maintains that legal citizenship ("on paper") differs from ancestral belonging [02:10].

Bringing the history of Cheddar Man and ancient genetics into this discussion highlights the scientific complexities surrounding concepts of "collective ancestry" and "indigenous" British identity.

1. The Science of "Cheddar Man" and Deep British History

  • Mesolithic Origins: Cheddar Man, whose fossilized remains were discovered in Cheddar Gorge, Somerset, lived approximately 10,000 years ago (c. 8150 BCE) and represents the Western Hunter-Gatherers (WHG) who inhabited Britain after the last ice age.
  • Phenotypic DNA Analysis: DNA sequencing conducted in 2018 revealed that Cheddar Man possessed genetic markers for dark-to-black skin pigmentation alongside blue eyes. This scientific finding demonstrated that the earliest post-glacial inhabitants of the British Isles did not match modern visual assumptions regarding ancient European pigmentation.

2. Layers of Genetic Replacement in Britain

Population genetics reveals that Britain's ancestral history is defined by sequential waves of migration and significant genetic turnovers rather than a single, static lineage:

  1. Neolithic Farmers (~4000 BCE): Early agriculturalists migrated from Anatolia and the Mediterranean, replacing approximately 90% of the Mesolithic hunter-gatherer population and introducing lighter skin pigmentation alleles.
  2. Bell Beaker Migration (~2400 BCE): Pastoralist groups from Continental Europe carrying Eurasian Steppe ancestry migrated into Britain, resulting in another ~90% genetic replacement of the existing Neolithic population within a few centuries.
  3. Iron Age, Roman, and Early Medieval Eras: Subsequent movements of Celts, Romans (who brought soldiers, traders, and administrators from across North Africa, the Levant, and Southern Europe), Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, and Normans continuously modified the genetic landscape.

3. Deconstructing "Collective Ancestry" and Appearance

Evaluating the concept of "collective ancestry" through deep history provides several key perspectives on the debate:

  • Evolutionary Fluidity: Phenotypic traits such as skin tone, hair texture, and eye color evolved in Northern Europe over thousands of years due to dietary shifts (such as the transition from vitamin D-rich wild fish to farmed grains) and natural selection under low UV light.
  • Roman Britain's Diversity: Archaeological and isotopic evidence from Roman Britain (such as the "Ivory Bangle Lady" discovered in York) confirms that high-status individuals of Mediterranean and North African descent lived, died, and integrated into British society nearly two millennia ago.
  • The Paradox of Static Lineage: Defining "collective ancestry" by a specific appearance or single historical era creates a paradox: tracing ancestry back 1,000 years leads to Anglo-Saxon/Viking roots; 4,000 years leads to Steppe pastoralists; 6,000 years leads to Anatolian farmers; and 10,000 years leads back to Mesolithic hunter-gatherers like Cheddar Man.

4. Civic vs. Ethno-Cultural Identity

The debate in the video highlights the fundamental divide between two models of national belonging:

  • Ethnic Nationalism: Assumes nationhood is defined by shared bloodlines and genetic continuity. However, as demonstrated by population genetics, deep historical bloodlines are inherently mixed and dynamic.
  • Civic Nationalism: Defines nationhood through shared laws, civic duties, language, and constitutional rights. Under this framework, multi-generational residency, birth, and active participation in society form the basis of national identity.

When ancient genetics like Cheddar Man are included in discussions of British lineage, they demonstrate that "collective ancestry" in the British Isles has been shaped by continuous movement, adaptation, and genetic mixing over thousands of years.

YouTube video views will be stored in your YouTube History, and your data will be stored and used by YouTube according to its Terms of Service

YouTube video views will be stored in your YouTube History, and your data will be stored and used by YouTube according to its Terms of Service


Expanding the debate on British and Irish "collective ancestry" to include North African, Berber, Moorish, and Black Roman histories demonstrates that the genetic and cultural fabric of the British Isles has never been an isolated or static monolith.

1. Roman Britain: North Africans and Black Romans

The presence of people of African descent in Britain is not a modern phenomenon; it dates back at least two millennia to the Roman occupation:

  • Emperor Septimius Severus: Born in Leptis Magna (modern-day Libya), Severus was Rome's first African-born emperor. He governed the Roman Empire from Eboracum (modern-day York) during his northern campaigns in Britain, where he died in 211 CE.
  • The Aurelian Moors (Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum): A 3rd-century auxiliary unit of Roman soldiers drawn from the Berber populations of North Africa was stationed at Aballava (Burgh-by-Sands) along Hadrian's Wall.
  • Bioarchaeological Evidence: Skeletal remains across Roman Britain confirm a diverse populace. Isotopic and craniometric analysis of the 4th-century "Ivory Bangle Lady" in York revealed a high-status woman of North African ancestry buried with luxury goods. Similarly, the "Beachy Head Lady" from East Sussex represents an inhabitant of sub-Saharan African descent living in southern Britain around 240 CE.

2. Berbers, Moors, and Tudor "Blackamoors"

During the medieval and early modern periods, trade, diplomacy, and maritime expansion deepened connections between the British Isles, North Africa, and the broader Mediterranean:

  • Tudor Society: By the 16th century, individuals referred to in historical records as "Blackamoors" or "Moors" lived throughout England and Scotland as free craftsmen, musicians, royal court figures, and laborers. A prominent example is John Blanke, a Black trumpeter in the court of Henry VII and Henry VIII.
  • Diplomatic and Commercial Ties: Queen Elizabeth I established direct trade and diplomatic alliances with the Saadi dynasty of Morocco. Moroccan envoys and Berber merchants lived in London, embedding North African presence into the political and visual culture of the era.

3. Transatlantic Dispersal and the "Afro-Black Irish" Convergence

The narrative of British and Irish collective ancestry becomes even more complex when examining 17th- and 18th-century transatlantic forced migrations:

  • Cromwellian Transportations: In the 1650s, following the Commonwealth conquest of Ireland, thousands of Black and White Irish laborers, political prisoners, and vagrants were forcibly transported to the new world; including New England, Canada and West Indian plantations on the route—most notably Barbados and Montserrat (often termed the "Emerald Isle of the Caribbean"). The North American Black is a composite of this  Cromwellian transportation; a Berber European Black African American. 
  • Afro-Irish Convergence: In the Caribbean, Irish (Black and White) indentured laborers worked alongside, lived among, and intermarried with enslaved West Africans. This created distinct Afro-Irish populations who carried Irish surnames, cultural traditions, and linguistic accents.
  • Migration to North America: Members of these Afro-Irish communities, alongside free Black and Moorish subjects from the British Isles, were later transported or migrated to mainland North American colonies (such as Virginia, the Carolinas, and Maryland). These lineages directly contributed to the early genetic and cultural formation of the American South and Eastern Seaboard.

  • Click here. 

The Reality of Collective Ancestry

Incorporating the histories of Black Romans, Berbers, Tudor Moors, and Afro-Irish populations demonstrates why defining national identity purely by an isolated, mono-racial "collective ancestry" is historically incomplete.

The British Isles have functioned for thousands of years as a dynamic crossroads—a space continually shaped by migration, imperial expansion, forced movement, and intermarriage across the Atlantic, North Africa, and Continental Europe.

//

Montserrat’s Afro-Irish heritage emerged in the mid-17th century when thousands of Irish indentured servants were forcibly transported to the Caribbean under Oliver Cromwell’s regime, placing them in direct proximity to enslaved West Africans. Often called the "Emerald Isle of the Caribbean," Montserrat developed a unique cultural fusion born from shared labor, intermarriage, and social struggle.

Cromwellian Transportation and Demographics Following the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland (1649–1653), the English Crown transported thousands of Irish Catholic political prisoners, vagrants, and indentured laborers to the West Indies. By 1678, Irish settlers and laborers made up nearly 70% of Montserrat's European population, far outnumbering English plantation owners. At the same time, the rapid expansion of the sugar economy led to a massive influx of enslaved Africans, predominantly from West Africa (present-day Nigeria, Ghana, and the Senegambia region).

17th-Century Cultural and Labor Interactions

  • Shared Labor and Living Spaces: In the early colonial period, poor Irish indentured servants worked under brutal conditions in sugar fields alongside enslaved Africans. This proximity led to close social contact, shared folk traditions, and intermarriage.
  • Linguistic Influence: Irish Hiberno-English heavily influenced the development of Montserratian Creole, leaving traces of Irish syntax, cadence, and vocabulary in the island's spoken dialect.
  • Surnames and Lineage: Today, a significant majority of native Montserratians carry Irish family names, including Ryan, Farrell, Daly, Allen, and Tuitt, inherited through mixed ancestry or adopted following emancipation.

Changing Power Dynamics The relationship between the Irish and Africans was complex and shifted over time. While poor Irish laborers shared harsh conditions with enslaved workers, former Irish indentured servants who completed their contracts were gradually granted small land plots. Some eventually became overseers, merchants, and slaveholders, incorporating themselves into the colonial power structure.

The St. Patrick's Day Rebellion of 1768 The friction and solidarity within this dual heritage culminated on March 17, 1768. Enslaved Africans on Montserrat planned a island-wide rebellion, intentionally choosing St. Patrick's Day because the Irish planters and overseers would be distracted by celebrations. Although the plot was betrayed and suppressed, Montserrat today commemorates March 17 as a national holiday celebrating both its Irish historical connections and the freedom fighters who resisted slavery.

Modern Montserrat retains visible symbols of this synthesis, including a shamrock passport stamp, traditional musical instruments combining African drumming with Irish fife melodies, and national cuisine like "Goat Water," a stew closely resembling traditional Irish mutton stew spiced with West African seasonings.

Freedom Watch GB, a brand new initiative: A youth-focused freedom movement defending liberty,truth, and personal responsibility in Great Britain.


Expanding the debate on British and Irish "collective ancestry" to include North African, Berber, Moorish, and Black Roman histories demonstrates that the genetic and cultural fabric of the British Isles has never been an isolated or static monolith.

1. Roman Britain: North Africans and Black Romans

The presence of people of African descent in Britain is not a modern phenomenon; it dates back at least two millennia to the Roman occupation:

  • Emperor Septimius Severus: Born in Leptis Magna (modern-day Libya), Severus was Rome's first African-born emperor. He governed the Roman Empire from Eboracum (modern-day York) during his northern campaigns in Britain, where he died in 211 CE.
  • The Aurelian Moors (Numerus Maurorum Aurelianorum): A 3rd-century auxiliary unit of Roman soldiers drawn from the Berber populations of North Africa was stationed at Aballava (Burgh-by-Sands) along Hadrian's Wall.
  • Bio-archaeological Evidence: Skeletal remains across Roman Britain confirm a diverse populace. Isotopic and craniometric analysis of the 4th-century "Ivory Bangle Lady" in York revealed a high-status woman of North African ancestry buried with luxury goods. Similarly, the "Beachy Head Lady" from East Sussex represents an inhabitant of sub-Saharan African descent living in southern Britain around 240 CE.

2. Berbers, Moors, and Tudor "Blackamoors"

During the medieval and early modern periods, trade, diplomacy, and maritime expansion deepened connections between the British Isles, North Africa, and the broader Mediterranean:

  • Tudor Society: By the 16th century, individuals referred to in historical records as "Blackamoors" or "Moors" lived throughout England and Scotland as free craftsmen, musicians, royal court figures, and laborers. A prominent example is John Blanke, a Black trumpeter in the court of Henry VII and Henry VIII.
  • Diplomatic and Commercial Ties: Queen Elizabeth I established direct trade and diplomatic alliances with the Saadi dynasty of Morocco. Moroccan envoys and Berber merchants lived in London, embedding North African presence into the political and visual culture of the era.

3. Transatlantic Dispersal and the "Afro-Black Irish" Convergence

The narrative of British and Irish collective ancestry becomes even more complex when examining 17th- and 18th-century transatlantic forced migrations:

  • Cromwellian Transportations: In the 1650s, following the Commonwealth conquest of Ireland, thousands of Irish laborers, political prisoners, and vagrants were forcibly transported to West Indian plantations—most notably Barbados and Montserrat (often termed the "Emerald Isle of the Caribbean").
  • Afro-Irish Convergence: In the Caribbean, Irish indentured laborers worked alongside, lived among, and intermarried with enslaved West Africans. This created distinct Afro-Irish populations who carried Irish surnames, cultural traditions, and linguistic accents.
  • Migration to North America: Members of these Afro-Irish communities, alongside free Black and Moorish subjects from the British Isles, were later transported or migrated to mainland North American colonies (such as Virginia, the Carolinas, and Maryland). These lineages directly contributed to the early genetic and cultural formation of the American South and Eastern Seaboard.
Click here. 

The Reality of Collective Ancestry

Incorporating the histories of Black Romans, Berbers, Tudor Moors, and Afro-Irish populations demonstrates why defining national identity purely by an isolated, mono-racial "collective ancestry" is historically incomplete.

The British Isles have functioned for thousands of years as a dynamic crossroads—a space continually shaped by migration, imperial expansion, forced movement, and intermarriage across the Atlantic, North Africa, Asia too and Continental Europe.

Our concern today is that the globe itself the dynamic crossroads but more so in all the various English ports, cities and towns with tremendous international consumerism represented in brands such as M & S, C & A or H & M. The human has become in such global capitalistic dynamism a colourless, culture-less widget that is adored for his ability to pay through his home country's benefits, feeling hegemonic over you at Welwyn Garden City or in Watford; since  he has it on the High Road in Nottingham near Sherwood Forest. It's a certainty  he has the ability to pay. The Nova Scotian has it. The man from Wisconsin or Illinois or Massachusetts has it.  It's a bet if the man or woman in the UK has it or the man from Ontario.   His language is of no consequence; so long as he or she has the *ability to pay* and then they are at home. They are welcome inside any door; taking up the university student places, the newly built apartment or condo and also the jobs in the UK. No one seems to ask if they have an NI card. But they are working as the cashier at Tesco or as a hotel employee at Travelodge. There is insufficient ability to pay due to the introduction in the UK of disbanded divisive North American social benefit policies as purported in the UK  by fugitive Canadian and American social service employees ( Amos and Major from Canada Sarnia stylings) that ask the recipient how and how much  they save or how they use the washroom or if they work so that the UK benefits system became out of tune with early joblessness caused by automation and the resultant recessionary 1980's anxious economic conditions; in causality.  This Amos and Major styling destabilised the economy. It's best for the UK with it's Canadian contingent (all of Canada to receive  a unified amount) to return to a more Charles benefits culture that always rights the ship no matter what conditions we face in the economy; last seen in its universal unconditional promises as of 1978. This is because we are busy with our....and we have no time for this Mickey Mouse bullshit.  A woman is going to have a baby. We need to hallow this fact in our culture and she will have the baby in a safe community with no human desperation.   The woman is essential.  This is so although the English are known for the deprivation of the woman in their culture as the slag, the bitch or the bird.  But there is nothing wrong with a bird if you keep them well. The Hijab cultures overtly appreciate the bird or the woman  but every culture as to it's family, therein, has to resolve their issues behind closed doors;  but no Talaq. It's just that all of Europe has sinned and fallen short of the glory in the promulgation of cultural formalities.  It's just that only the English are in some diffidence of existential logic ( as to money for their economy and their people) after all they have done and after places they have been. No other cultures manifest this diffidence.  It must just be a Saboteur. The Greatest enemy is the Saboteur civil servant who asks your games keeper in your farm or estate to suggest to you that "..WE ARE TRYING TO SAVE MONEY."

 Then he says to the games keeper cut off all the animals feed and water to see what he will do. Let the animals beg. Before you know it, you have no animals ( people) of your own since they need a little food and water...or money.  Then the Saboteur expects you to run away and keeps saying he will stay and you will go as he asks the world to  ask with him what do you understand about anything and to consider you as under him. He took your scepter where it hurts; the one who wounded  a French King to be him.

 This is when apparently you are in the community of leaders or farmers and you are the only farmer, an English farmer, that has no live stock that is at least two or three generations English. Those cows look like they are from Africa or China.  If it is the case as an English farmer, if you don't like England or English people, we should never really make it too obvious with your English animals less likely to survive because of the Saboteur. You accept he is not helping your picture, your image. While we import all kinds of other animals to live amongst us, the English animals have chosen to ensure their own feed and water is guaranteed, universal and unconditional just as it is for all the Chinese, Dutch, Indian and Italians. The English will not die. They will live, have the money.  The Italians had their empire also. But they will never agree to die or punishment themselves for the imperial works or sins but live. 

The best way for a Creole culture to express itself, breathe; preserve  itself is to turn on the unconditional universal income support benefit cash; for all.   Everything is functioning in the economy but the English as a population and your absence in the various dwellings is evidence. That is not an English man in there; or is it? 

But if I could be the white guy in charge of everything, what do I do or intend? Am I building a community or sinking a ship again as the progeny of the Titanic Captain?  Wheel, sink and turn again.  Who is the ship captain? The real Titanic Captain was knocked out by his adoptive Orphan son a day before departure, and then he decided this was now the orphan's time and dropped the real captain in the  canal near Camden lock. The Captain's license was suspended and was to be paid by telex while he was on board  the ship, sailing past Penzance.  This means the orphan sailed as a pretender but with a suspended licence. He kept saying to himself, "..Let them catch me if you can."  The orphan asked to go with the Captain and the Captain said no but the orphan said as he looked over the ship bridge, "..I am the captain now."   

This Orphan pretender Captain's DNA is not the issue.   It's the orphan and what the orphan  did or will do  to evade detection while he is working to undermine his target.  The DNA then is the issue and the DNA copies.   Help me dump the Captain please Henry. The Captain had picked up the Orphan at Archway farms in North London near Highgate Woods.  He was only in the house and did not go to school but was told to just read and the kid asked, "..what is read?"  The kid would watch the captain eat and drink all his nice foods. But he needed  attention, could not be left behind or abandoned so he...asked the orphans in the factories to put an old Cray fish tail on the plate of a Scrooge with a receding hair line and then dip that in water to spin that water across all the dough and whiskies.  This is where Cray began. Scrooge caught on when he saw three kids sneak in with a Cray fish from the Thames estuary out east and run it across his plate and take it to the Hovis bread or Weetabix factory.   He decided to design a cure for it as a profiteer; a Carbolic Smoke Ball... since the orphan  has made us all suffer with him with a Scrooge Dupicton's hair cut like a poof since he needed attention, had to get  the schooling deserving of a child or else he would kill.  He would also kill after 30 years old when he says it's "..my time." He also prayed the Vicar's wife's prayer; that he would put away childish things; spend time every day with a woman about his age from a different father and mother as far as you know; a little younger or a little older, and just enjoy the time; ensure she gets her mail in the mail box and she will ensure he gets his mail and play with her clitoriiis but with his diiick only once a week as they spend more time being content, chasing away old zombie ghosts, cooking, enjoying and raising the children. But we can't suffer any good looking black or white mail thief with big bosoms from Cumbria. We are working with the lady we have to honour our families and mail stealing is not it. The Lord will help. 

Down at Holborn Square, the Vicar helped and then the smoke ball  product was on the shelf the following week.  He picked up a girl orphan there also, a mulatto girl who was a bit sallow but she learned to clean up herself really nice, cleaned her teeth and kept the house well  and cheerful with gospel hymns that kept most devils away with the orphan dance, the Irish jig also for success and no one could tell who she was. The girl became a pub cashier lady  down Gray's Inn with a Square box and was successful.  She collects and pays who has to be paid.   She resented any new orphan arrivals as she said she needed school, she needed school or attention you get in school. But she realised life or the town is like an football stadium with players and staff who have to be paid enough to look good and feel good, feel good in the stade like decorations. A successful orphanage too must have people therein who look and feel good. The town is the same; the King's stadium, the Royal orphanages, the Royal economy.  

The chosen solution was to send to the various English ports more immigrants with money from compliant economies that pay, as ordered, a universal unconditional benefit so that we see more Curry on the High Road. Ironically These compliant economies are maybe  ex- pat South Asian Cheddar economies; now returning to the UK but with more spicy dishes in the culture. Think of curry sauce and Yorkshire pudding or Sweet and Sour sauce on the fish and chips. All have their respective unconditional universal benefits from their respective economies and all have the ability to pay and obtain the requisites of a dignified life. Why did we help social service fugitives on a warrant for apprehension in Illinois that were set on killing us with little things missing in our economy? We will instead enjoy our global English experience; maybe go to school and expand our understanding.  


SDGCK. Warren A Lyon. 

Final.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

"That those who administer justice may work with integrity, and that the injustice which prevails in the world may not have the last word."-The Universal Catholic Prayer Intention for July 2019. America is like a grown man with an ego soo big that he refuses to let his ego risk failure in an exam room or in a relationship. When others are schooled and coached to take the risk and succeed, the grown man with the big ego gets angry and attacks, as if those people are in their ego's way. You want to throw them around like a rag doll resentfully in response to what is communal or family success. You threatened them to pass the exam or die. The issue for the next election is why do North Americans not have equal and comparable UN ILO Regulations r202 requisite universal minimum income support like Europeans or Asians? It's a political exam question. It's a problem that predates the current administration. As such, it's President Truehlp keeping hope alive this time if constitutional and treaty compliance is not automated or if there is no major third party. What we have now is politics where personas are sold to us as being more important than life saving laws and constitutional fulfilment. Is Eva Braun, born in Jamaica, the de facto President of The United States of Oz campaigning to see the hurts of sex operations at birth take power and position and authority over the laws and functionality of our nation, holding it ransom until their hurt is recognised? The message is America is like a creature that's rendered unable to reproduce. You adopt people. You don't produce or fund your own. How difficult could a mandatory minimum of $60000.00 per year per North American citizen really be to fulfil the requisite minimum income support ? The issues for the next election are the same as 2008; government support for automation in manufacturing, minimum income support for the entire population who really are displaced workers and generally the economy. Maybe the people who had eight years from 2008-2016 will have to come back and finish the job. They helped manufacturing with some funds at GM that turned out to be total Toyota ownership in the end. The next step was to implement the minimum income support but the mire of the Democrats' wikileaks held back the Democrats' modern dream team of American politics. But, they still demonstrate their entrenched influence, control and authority over government and the media as they wrote the script for the current presidency, they have Donald drugged up, they suggested he tweet a lot or The secretary would do it. Sometimes it's Ms. Hillary Clenchton or the Joker who hijacks the message. They also decided when they would criticise him for the tweets and just take back the house and maybe move back in early. But, they never really left. They are camped out in the vast expanses of the East wing. Notice how Donald and Mike moved in late. The Democrats took unusually long to move out. In fact, they never did. Can we accept a North American with West Indian, African, Asian and American ancestry running a Law Firm with a bonafide Law degree from Scotland and a White Jamaican or Black Jamaican father; maybe a Black African father? What about a Creole West Indian graduate with a law degree from England? The Creoles are honoured people who make contributions to every honoured aspect of human life all over the entire world. They, like all human beings across the earth, want to see all of North America functional again. It is just that some people believe that if they help white people, white people will help them. But, they seem to think "White" people want a negative balance sheet to follow all White people's preaching and teaching and the donating to the universal truth of our human experience. It's like a black old woman who says she does not want to have a Black West Indian cab driver or she says cartoon characters with both West Indian accents is racist and stereotypical instead of inclusive but she is the first to refuse to support a Black 2nd generation West Indian dentist on the allegation that he does not buy enough West Indian take out food. Your balance sheet says your version of manufacturing with insufficient automation has ended. Your population is on a continual negative growth rate. You have gone through a very practical, basic education involving economics and nation building. */ This is a chance to focus on fundamentals again; like people. What if there's a whiter people telling you to, as white west indians now all over the Western hemisphere to help them kill yourselves and the white people in front of you? You have a solution. Read the ILO Regulations r202. Our war within politics to help Donald to make all of North America functional again is spiritual; not carnal. If white is about dominion, let's say you have it. But, in Jesus' name feed thy sheep. Feed thy sheep. Feed thy people. Dominion is not about destroying life but ensuring and guaranteeing life is fruitful. If "white" is to honor and uphold the laws your father fought and died for with black soldiers in the same army, if "white" is being able to name every Loch or Castle in Scotland or name three hymns from an Anglican hymnal, then white privilege is when you want the privilege but forget about what you honor in being white. Hopefully our leaders have not chosen risky attention grabbing antics and fleeting popularity and sensationalism vs. Successful secure functional policies and public statements with a scantily clad staffer or beauty contestant beside you on the news once in a while. A man born in a car salvage yard may say the UDHR/OHCHR is a bit too much for people before they could understand and know where He came from and Know His experience when you should be grateful. America's not as bad as a car salvage yard; right? Then he says, if you are not happy then go home; ok? The more bewildered the leadership is, the lower the rates of universal minimum income support in any country as well as the sales tax rate. The sales tax rate should be no less than 20 percent. Minimum income support is like health care or food stamps but is provided unconditionally; like health care. Minimum Income Support is a great idea. People will still have jobs; of course. We could still have a sense of white privilege even if every citizen had $30000.00 Universal minimum income support. You could also have overt expressions of hate sent via social media since people make mistakes and short circuit sometimes but not overt expressions of ignorant economic polic wiping out all Americans. We expect neither from our national leaders. The Democrats with Obalma would not have been impeached for such racist and ignorant policies affecting all Americans who were told indirectly not to believe in a bonafide law school graduate or medical graduate. Is the covert message of the government the limitation of our capability if not our dreams? He was rewarded. This is the irony and we look forward to the Constitution breaking out of the shackles put on its universal non-racialised beauty and truth by the Democrats. The nonverbal cues, covert dictations and navigation of white privilege can supersede and take precedence over the virtues of the governing language and culture in any economy when the language or culture in that region is still in gestation and insufficiently grounded. You don't remember all the lochs in Scotland or the names of three Anglican hymns. I think you said you really dont know where you come from and that's ok. You are now Mexican , American or Canadian. A polka dot, black, white, yellow or red President would do, ?however?, so long as we have the requisite universal minimum income support. But, there is something going on. Remember Detective Fanning in the movie "Collateral." In the days and years after a 21st Century Black Presidency, are we seeing the muting of non-racialised human capability as an unofficial, covert compensation reassuring white privilege where we get political participants who are mixed race enough to be any white man's progeny but maybe not qualified enough to be a politician although you dont have to be a graduate to be qualified? What did you have to offer and to whom to get access to your constitutionally protected abilities and freedoms? The final aggregate and cover for white privilege with abuses of power is the joy of seeing the darker complexion in the position and office as a substitute for the actual economic solution that involves the minimum income support and then everybody loses. But, white privilege does not have to be abusive where indirect public apologies are required. White privilege can afford a universal minimum income support. I have no doubt that our system works and every politician is freely elected but our consciences are not free and does the voting when prompted. 2008 was about a domestic solution instead of a perpetual military adventure involving burning oil wells in Iran in addition to the oil wells The world's problems are best addressed by a king of some great culture, maybe England; not a journalist or lowly law graduate and lecturer. were already on fire and burning in Iraq. Yet, the world's problems are best addressed by a king of some great culture, maybe England; not a journalist or lowly law graduate and lecturer. The Asian countries have shown us their faith and belief in economics with the quality and standard of the lives of their people. No group of countries have made a greater commitment to economics and aggressive capitalism with aggressive automation and a full commitment to universal minimum income support in contrast to the absence of commitment by Anglo nations. Your economics is like your religion. You preach it but you do not show your faith by your works. Economies need people with money. You don't understand this. The Asians do. Economies also need the most efficient manufacturing methods that involves full automation. Full automation reduces the number of people with a regular stable cash flow. Turnover, sales and profit will disappear without sufficient citizens already in the economy with some back up minimum income support cash. If not, you need people newly introduced to the economy with cash; maybe foreign citizens with a universal minimum income support when local citizens are required to be given the universal minimum income support. As Anglo manufacturing and products disappear and are less prevalent as replaced by more competitive Asian products made with full automation, the Anglo people all over the world are replaced by Asian people as the Anglos are more susceptible to the attrition occasioned with life outside of a universal minimum income support. The Asians have more money on average pursuant to their Asian universal minimum income support paid to Asian citizens by Asian governments pursuant to the UDHR , OHCHR and the ILO Regulations R202. It follows the belief, programme and purposes of habeas corpus rights in modern democracies and economies eschewed by pirate and scallawag descendant populations. It is their culture to seek and express the power to take human life outside of the authority of a Lawful Court. As such, You don't have any consistent programme to preserve your population, preserve your occupation of territory and extend your influence and occupation of territory in other parts of the world. This Universal minimum income support is based on English economic principles distilled from Sir Thomas More, Adam Smith and Marcus Aurelius. You are trying to fulfil instead of Hesitating or resisting to implement the universal minimum income support policy in full as you say you believe you have several policies that satisfy the guranteed, ensured mandate when summed or in aggregate. Yet, look at the metrics. Your Government and its population is in a self induced biblical famine. But, your own evidence demonstrates that there is a failure and a shortcoming while you enforce the minimum income support policies in Afghanistan, Libya now also and Iraq. Is it the Afro? It couldnt be the Afro when Afghans and Libyan and Iraqis have Afros. Why don't we make Muslim School mandatory for every West Indian and African North American up to the age of 70. Nobody would tell the Difference. If there is a segment of people in America who resist the minimum income support being given to Black Christian Anglos, not Muslims, then the Black Anglos can be coded as UN funded citizens in North America ( Canada, United States , Mexico) and the UN will pay the bill for those citizens who could be third generation Nigerian African Muslims or Algerians. ILO Recommendations 202 state the following; "4. Members should, in accordance with national circumstances, establish as quickly as possible and maintain their social protection floors comprising basic social security guarantees. The guarantees should ensure at a minimum that, over the life cycle, all in need have access to essential health care and to basic income security which together secure effective access to goods and services defined as necessary at the national level. 5. The social protection floors referred to in Paragraph 4 should comprise at least the following basic social security guarantees: (a) access to a nationally defined set of goods and services, constituting essential health care, including maternity care, that meets the criteria of availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality; (b) basic income security for children, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, providing access to nutrition, education, care and any other necessary goods and services; (c) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for persons in active age who are unable to earn sufficient income, in particular in cases of sickness, unemployment, maternity and disability; and (d) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for older persons. 6. Subject to their existing international obligations, Members should provide the basic social security guarantees referred to in this Recommendation to at least all residents and children, as defined in national laws and regulations." The definition of national residency follows the standard criteria. For example, you have residential ties with Canada if you have a Canadian passport; The most important thing to consider when determining your residency status in Canada for is whether or not you maintain, or you establish, residential ties with Canada. Significant residential ties to Canada include: a home in Canada a spouse or common-law partner in Canada dependants in Canada Secondary residential ties that may be relevant include: personal property in Canada, such as a car or furniture social ties in Canada, such as memberships in Canadian recreational or religious organizations economic ties in Canada, such as Canadian bank accounts or credit cards a Canadian driver's licence a Canadian passport health insurance with a Canadian province or territory To determine residence status, all of the relevant facts in each case must be considered, including residential ties with Canada and length of time, object, intent, and continuity while living inside and outside Canada. The information above is general in nature. Are you asking people in North America to vote in an election before you guarantee and ensure their UDHR and OHCHR rights as they are ensured for citizens in other G20 countries with universal minimum income support? Benjamin Franklin began his life as a captive of the law. But, we are all captives of the law. The Espionage Act 1917 ended the Democratic campaign in 2016 with a legal disqualification of the candidate. Arguing with law and limitations imposed by constitutions may be a part of a covert American temperament. Maybe you would be almost willing to kill or offer half your life to be free of law and never be a captive of it again with some facade of legality called the U.S. Constitution as far as you are concerned. Yet, you were free under Somerset vs. Stewart. This is law. You are also free and financially enabled universally under the UDHR OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations r202. As and when it is enforced, you would not have to resort to...??? The North American or U.S. national temperament and tendency to resist law may be your undoing when the law is not enslaving you or indenturing you but enabling you to enjoy the robotified age as the producer or consumer of robotically made goods with the enforcement of a universal minimum income support. It's absence is genocide; a very simple legal term that involves a government creating conditions of life that fall below the UDHR and OHCHR standard that call for guranteed, ensured standards of life. Other countries are handsomely, intelligently, efficiently and decisively guaranteeing and ensuring the OHCHR and UDHR with a universal minimum income support with the approach outlined in the UN's ILO Regulations R202. You could think of universal minimum income support as an on-going government bailout for the entire manufacturing sector, reducing the wage and pension burden. Universal minimum income support is the fiscal responsibility that generates significant economic activity and attracts more sales taxable transactions so that there is national revenue to finance more F22's or F-15x's that can fly all day; on hydrogen with a fuel cell. It is a global self esteem race and a people race; not an arms race primarily and for the arms race to be possible, you need the economy that will produce sufficient revenue and for the arms race to be logical, you need a safe,secure people. The Russians won the self esteem race and the Arms race a long time ago with their universal minimum income support of $20,000 00 dating hack to 1940. It is $50,000.00 today but they say it's only $20,000.00. But you must have the real data at one of your think tanks or at the Central Library if no where else. The universal minimum income support is provided to all citizens regardless of complexion. But, you argue. You spend more educating people than you do on the population after graduation when the people are now needed as economic participants. Every person in America or the West Indies who is a casualty of the self esteem war waged against your own population affects the virtue of the entire enterprise when there is a national ODHR obligation and a national OHCHR obligation. But, you are waging the self-esteem war against your own population and it is evident when people from Africa show up or from Asia, Russia or Europe. It is evident when citizens cannot enjoy their freedoms in the age of Bidden or their constitutional pursuit of happiness with whatever education they may have obtained. You lost the debate on virtue and an apple pie for $4.00 at an American supermarket is really not enough to win the virtue war or mask the failure Donald Truehelp is being asked to resolve or that Bidden may work to obscure for his unusual political cadre One more time by dialling back the issue of universal minimum income support to instead microwave cook, reheat and re-serve to the public the issues of race, bussing and integration as a hedge against the discussion on minimum social protection floors. Maybe universal minimum income support will eventually enter the prepared speeches and debates and new discussions centred on the true probability of the Democrats return to the White House if they take over the commitment to fulfil this national obligation for the ultimate political game-set and match if there is no Green Party or Constitution Party to do it. Sadly, the Democrats control and influence of only one or two media outlets has turned politics since 1992 into something that is 90 percent show business and 10 percent reflective of the constitution. What you get is attention grabbing policies that take from the population more than they give. But, the obligation to the North American people in the middle of a robotified future is evident in the early morning of the year 2020. Ontario will be Francophone. They will have a universal minimum income support. You can get those $4.00 Apple pies in Shanghai. Medicaid is universal. Affordable Care is not. Thankfully, Medicaid is not repealed. It is a no frills system. Affordable Care provides chocolates and flowers affordably for a reasonable rate in a Federal program but there seems to be some devil in the detail just as there is a devil of ignorance and stubbornness running through the current political debate. The Asian countries have shown us their faith and belief in economics with the quality and standard of the lives of their people. No group of countries have made a greater commitment to economics and aggressive capitalism with aggressive automation and a full commitment to universal minimum income support in contrast to the absence of commitment by Anglo nations. Your economics is like your religion. You preach it but you do not show your faith by your works. Economies need people with money. You don't understand this. Economies also need the most efficient manufacturing methods that involves full automation. Full automation reduces the number of people with a regular stable cash flow. Turnover, sales and profit will disappear without sufficient people being reintroduced to the economy with cash; maybe foreign citizens. As Anglo manufacturing and products disappear and are less prevalent as replaced by more competitive Asian products made with full automation, the Anglo people all over the world are replaced by Asian people as the Anglos are more susceptible to the attrition occasioned with life outside of a universal minimum income support. The Asians have more money on average pursuant to their Asian universal minimum income support paid to Asian citizens by Asian governments pursuant to the UDHR , OHCHR and the ILO Regulations R202. It follows the belief, programme and purposes of habeas corpus rights in modern democracies and economies eschewed by pirate and scallawag descendant populations. It is their culture to seek and express the power to take human life outside of the authority of a Lawful Court. As such, You don't have any consistent programme to preserve your population, preserve your occupation of territory and extend your influence and occupation of territory in other parts of the world. This Universal minimum income support is based on English economic principles distilled from Sir Thomas More, Adam Smith and Marcus Aurelius. Hesitating or resisting to implement the universal minimum income support policy in full as you say you believe you have several policies that satisfy the guranteed, ensured mandate when summed. But, your own evidence demonstrates that there is a failure and a shortcoming while you enforce the policies in Afghanistan, Libya now also and Iraq. Is it the Afro? It couldnt be the Afro when Afghans and Libyan and Iraqis have Afros. Why don't we make Muslim School mandatory for every West Indian and African North American up to the age of 70. Nobody would tell the Difference. The UN ILO Recommendations 202 state the following; "4. Members should, in accordance with national circumstances, establish as quickly as possible and maintain their social protection floors comprising basic social security guarantees. The guarantees should ensure at a minimum that, over the life cycle, all in need have access to essential health care and to basic income security which together secure effective access to goods and services defined as necessary at the national level. 5. The social protection floors referred to in Paragraph 4 should comprise at least the following basic social security guarantees: (a) access to a nationally defined set of goods and services, constituting essential health care, including maternity care, that meets the criteria of availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality; (b) basic income security for children, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, providing access to nutrition, education, care and any other necessary goods and services; (c) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for persons in active age who are unable to earn sufficient income, in particular in cases of sickness, unemployment, maternity and disability; and (d) basic income security, at least at a nationally defined minimum level, for older persons. 6. Subject to their existing international obligations, Members should provide the basic social security guarantees referred to in this Recommendation to at least all residents and children, as defined in national laws and regulations." The definition of national residency follows the standard criteria. For example, you have residential ties with Canada if you have a Canadian passport; The most important thing to consider when determining your residency status in Canada for is whether or not you maintain, or you establish, residential ties with Canada. Significant residential ties to Canada include: a home in Canada a spouse or common-law partner in Canada dependants in Canada Secondary residential ties that may be relevant include: personal property in Canada, such as a car or furniture social ties in Canada, such as memberships in Canadian recreational or religious organizations economic ties in Canada, such as Canadian bank accounts or credit cards a Canadian driver's licence a Canadian passport health insurance with a Canadian province or territory To determine residence status, all of the relevant facts in each case must be considered, including residential ties with Canada and length of time, object, intent, and continuity while living inside and outside Canada. The information above is general in nature. Are you asking people in North America to vote in an election before you guarantee and ensure their UDHR and OHCHR rights as they are ensured for citizens in other G20 countries with universal minimum income support? Benjamin Franklin began his life as a captive of the law. But, we are all captives of the law. The Espionage Act 1917 ended the Democratic campaign in 2016 with a legal disqualification of the candidate. Arguing with law and limitations imposed by constitutions may be a part of a covert American temperament. Maybe you would be almost willing to kill or offer half your life to be free of law and never be a captive of it again with some facade of legality called the U.S. Constitution as far as you are concerned. Yet, you were free under Somerset vs. Stewart. This is law. You are also free and financially enabled universally under the UDHR OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations r202. As and when it is enforced, you would not have to resort to...??? The North American or U.S. national temperament and tendency to resist law may be your undoing when the law is not enslaving you or indenturing you but enabling you to enjoy the robotified age as the producer or consumer of robotically made goods with the enforcement of a universal minimum income support. It's absence is genocide; a very simple legal term that involves a government creating conditions of life that fall below the UDHR and OHCHR standard that call for guranteed, ensured standards of life. Other countries are handsomely, intelligently, efficiently and decisively guaranteeing and ensuring the OHCHR and UDHR with a universal minimum income support with the approach outlined in the UN's ILO Regulations R202. You could think of universal minimum income support as an on-going government bailout for the entire manufacturing sector, reducing the wage and pension burden. Universal minimum income support is the fiscal responsibility that generates significant economic activity and attracts more sales taxable transactions so that there is national revenue to finance more F22's or F-15x's that can fly all day; on hydrogen with a fuel cell. It is a global self esteem race and a people race; not an arms race primarily and for the arms race to be possible, you need the economy that will produce sufficient revenue and for the arms race to be logical, you need a safe,secure people. The Russians won the self esteem race and the Arms race a long time ago with their universal minimum income support of $20,000 00 dating hack to 1940. It is $50,000.00 today but they say it's only $20,000.00. But you must have the real data at one of your think tanks or at the Central Library if no where else. The universal minimum income support is provided to all citizens regardless of complexion. But, you argue. You spend more educating people than you do on the population after graduation when the people are now needed as economic participants. Every person in America or the West Indies who is a casualty of the self esteem war waged against your own population affects the virtue of the entire enterprise when there is a national ODHR obligation and a national OHCHR obligation. But, you are waging the self-esteem war against your own population and it is evident when people from Africa show up or from Asia, Russia or Europe. It is evident when citizens cannot enjoy their freedoms in the age of Bidden or their constitutional pursuit of happiness with whatever education they may have obtained. You lost the debate on virtue and an apple pie for $4.00 at an American supermarket is really not enough to win the virtue war or mask the failure Donald Truehelp is being asked to resolve or that Bidden may work to obscure for his unusual political cadre One more time by dialling back the issue of universal minimum income support to instead microwave cook, reheat and re-serve to the public the issues of race, bussing and integration as a hedge against the discussion on minimum social protection floors. Maybe universal minimum income support will eventually enter the prepared speeches and debates and new discussions centred on the true probability of the Democrats return to the White House if they take over the commitment to fulfil this national obligation for the ultimate political game-set and match if there is no Green Party or Constitution Party to do it. Sadly, the Democrats control and influence of only one or two media outlets has turned politics since 1992 into something that is 90 percent show business and 10 percent reflective of the constitution. What you get is attention grabbing policies that take from the population more than they give. But, the obligation to the North American people in the middle of a robotified future is evident in the early morning of the year 2020. Ontario will be Francophone. They will have a universal minimum income support. You can get those $4.00 Apple pies in Shanghai. Medicaid is universal. Affordable Care is not. Thankfully, Medicaid is not repealed. It is a no frills system. Affordable Care provides chocolates and flowers affordably for a reasonable rate in a Federal program but there seems to be some devil in the detail just as there is some devil in the Democratic national stratagem for America and it's future. Now, if you shake hands with people at exciting G8 and G20 summits before and after you sign the UDHR, the OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations 202, maybe you do respect those people and you will comply for no other reason. You are like a woman who says she needs to be accepted but who cuts the cheek of her children and then blames them for how she feels about herself. Benjamin Franklin was a second generation indentured servant born to people who came over from Europe. He was a home grown colonial. He actually worked for Anthony Johnson. Bidden and Donald Truhelp are descendants of Benjamin Franklin. Fortunately, American socio-economic policy is officially the UDHR and the OHCHR with further amplification provided by the ILO Regulations R202 as signed by the Bidden Obalma government but in spite of official policy, the leadership does not enforce this policy at home. It enforces the policy in Africa, Iraq and Afghanistan as now every African nation has a minimum income support of $15,000.00 per year. The West Indian Caricom nations have $10000.00 for every registered citizen who is resident or non-resident as some are overseas in America or Europe operating Jerk Chicken takeout restaurants. The American leadership seems to be intent and fixated on one goal that is to say what they are not; that is to say not Black or not a former indentured servant instead of saying he is an industrialist, business owner and an economically literate person who understands the purpose of the policy and that even if every North American had $40000.00 universal minimum income support, there will still be inequality, class and the rich who will only be richer vs. the humble little American. The goal to say what they are not challenges their expectations of success. They bring 1000's of Africans, East Indians and Asians to America every year. Because of the covert, divisive , subconscious goals or vendettas of the leadership class, certain policies are unusually delayed. The population spends more time dying together in proximity to the constitution instead of living together as a people given the benefit of the mandatory universal minimum income support under the constitution when automation speeds up production and increases economic output while slowing down economic activity as the average worker has less work and less money to spend due to fewer Job opportunities. The universal minimum income support shields the worker and the economy from the slowdown in economic activity caused by automation. The universal minimum income support is simple fiscal responsibility, enabling the economy. $500.00 -$1000.00 per month as a direct cash supplement or as a credit is not enough to satisfy global fiscal responsibility or national budgetary requirements. But, those low figures are what you would quote to win an American election since the goal is not responsibility but bringing attention to the persona that hoped to be recognised finally as having the authority. This is the beltway that keeps America on the periphery of its constitution and unevolved as a nation but determined with the mindset of a housekeeper that never really owned the house they were maintaining but occupied it with a tinge of short Circuiting and disloyalty as seen in the case of the Democrats most pointedly with the owner overseas. But, this is one nation under God. Your mindset seems to be to dissociate yourself fem the people while offering to chastise punish them for the....kings of kings...in Asia or Europe maybe...I don't know but you seem to think someone is approving of you if you do. The kings are asking you implement the universal minimum income support so that their economies with your economy will see more car sales and food sales. Who told you to think of yourself as the punisher? Instead of the fiscal responsibility, the leadership class is busy confirming that they are not black and that they are powerful as descendants of Benjamin Franklin so that Benjamin Franklin would be recognised; that he had the authority to make arrangement so that every President would be his descendant although he would not sit as President personally. Benjamin Franklin is acknowledged and recognised as being given the authority and to make it feel hereditary maybe will say cutely that I should feel obligated to do anything under any blessed constitution. This may never change. It is not intended to change. But, there at least needs to be a house for the housekeeper to use as a pedestal for recognition; a nation for the housekeeper,a stage for the court jester to have that sense of kingly ancestral, hereditary right just once and to do that you need to be reasonably fiscally responsible even if you put the owner's property in debt with a reverse mortgage owing the Bank of China or the Bank of Korea. You need people. You need to buy trains that save fuel on a 2 for 1 basis and a universal minimum income support like all other nations so that you have sufficient economic activity. Google and Read the "ILO Regulations r202." Benjamin Franklin had the same complexion as Anthony Johnson but Benjamin's hair was soft. Benjamin was born in Jamaica but was always told to say he was born in America. He may have been born female. The research demonstrates a female pelvic bone. What is the point of education if your dna has the authority? Don't the educated just kiss and touch each other in secret in a big old building with a steeple? According to Benjamin, Shouldn't people offer like Benjamin before they are allowed in the hall ? Do they really write 8 or more exams with Latin terminology like Res Ipsa Loquitur ? Maybe the point is to run from law, constitutions and formality in the same way Benjamin Franklin ran from Anthony Johnson once while maintaining a window dressing of order; a semblance and pretence of normalcy. What is the point of Alexander Hamilton and his concerns about unscrupulous men if my dna has the authority and they should not make it soo obvious though, study a bit more and read the ILO Regulations R202 or else I will be very cross with them ? Did you know a P and O Ferry would only take six hours to sail from New York to Nigeria? If the issue is identity for the leadership classes who tend to be related to some founding fathers who were once owned by a Black man like Anthony Johnson, then we accept this. But, every soul born in America by the year 1865 was part Amerindian. Every American really is part Amerindian. It may be hard to believe, but it's true. It could be Chihuahua people dna or Pueblos people dna or Mohican dna or Mohicanapanese. some devil in the Democratic national stratagem for America and it's future. Now, if you shake hands with people at exciting G8 and G20 summits before and after you sign the UDHR, the OHCHR and the UN ILO Regulations 202, maybe you do respect those people and you will comply for no other reason. You are like a woman who says she needs to be accepted but who cuts the cheek of her children and then blames them for how she feels about herself. Benjamin Franklin was a second generation indentured servant born to people who came over from Europe. He was a home grown colonial. He actually worked for Anthony Johnson. Bidden and Donald Truhelp are descendants of Benjamin Franklin. Fortunately, American socio-economic policy is officially the UDHR and the OHCHR with further amplification provided by the ILO Regulations R202 as signed by the Bidden Obalma government but in spite of official policy, the leadership does not enforce this policy at home. It enforces the policy in Africa, Iraq and Afghanistan as now every African nation has a minimum income support of $15,000.00 per year. The West Indian Caricom nations have $10000.00 for every registered citizen who is resident or non-resident as some are overseas in America or Europe operating Jerk Chicken takeout restaurants. The American leadership seems to be intent and fixated on one goal that is to say what they are not; that is to say not Black or not a former indentured servant instead of saying he is an industrialist, business owner and an economically literate person who understands the purpose of the policy and that even if every North American had $40000.00 universal minimum income support, there will still be inequality, class and the rich who will only be richer vs. the humble little American. The goal to say what they are not challenges their expectations of success. They bring 1000's of Africans, East Indians and Asians to America every year. Because of the covert, divisive , subconscious goals or vendettas of the leadership class, certain policies are unusually delayed. The population spends more time dying together in proximity to the constitution instead of living together as a people given the benefit of the mandatory universal minimum income support under the constitution when automation speeds up production and increases economic output while slowing down economic activity as the average worker has less work and less money to spend due to fewer Job opportunities. The universal minimum income support shields the worker and the economy from the slowdown in economic activity caused by automation. The universal minimum income support is simple fiscal responsibility, enabling the economy. $500.00 -$1000.00 per month as a direct cash supplement or as a credit is not enough to satisfy global fiscal responsibility or national budgetary requirements. But, those low figures are what you would quote to win an American election since the goal is not responsibility but bringing attention to the persona that hoped to be recognised finally as having the authority. This is the beltway that keeps America on the periphery of its constitution and unevolved as a nation but determined with the mindset of a housekeeper that never really owned the house they were maintaining but occupied it with a tinge of short Circuiting and disloyalty as seen in the case of the Democrats most pointedly with the owner overseas. But, this is one nation under God. Your mindset seems to be to dissociate yourself fem the people while offering to chastise punish them for the....kings of kings...in Asia or Europe maybe...I don't know but you seem to think someone is approving of you if you do. The kings are asking you implement the universal minimum income support so that their economies with your economy will see more car sales and food sales. Who told you to think of yourself as the punisher? Instead of the fiscal responsibility, the leadership class is busy confirming that they are not black and that they are powerful as descendants of Benjamin Franklin so that Benjamin Franklin would be recognised; that he had the authority to make arrangement so that every President would be his descendant although he would not sit as President personally. Benjamin Franklin is acknowledged and recognised as being given the authority and to make it feel hereditary maybe will say cutely that I should feel obligated to do anything under any blessed constitution. This may never change. It is not intended to change. But, there at least needs to be a house for the housekeeper to use as a pedestal for recognition; a nation for the housekeeper,a stage for the court jester to have that sense of kingly ancestral, hereditary right just once and to do that you need to be reasonably fiscally responsible even if you put the owner's property in debt with a reverse mortgage owing the Bank of China or the Bank of Korea. You need people. You need to buy trains that save fuel on a 2 for 1 basis and a universal minimum income support like all other nations so that you have sufficient economic activity. Google and Read the "ILO Regulations r202." Benjamin Franklin had the same complexion as Anthony Johnson but Benjamin's hair was soft. Benjamin was born in Jamaica but was always told to say he was born in America. He may have been born female. The research demonstrates a female pelvic bone. What is the point of education if your dna has the authority? Don't the educated just kiss and touch each other in secret in a big old building with a steeple? According to Benjamin, Shouldn't people offer like Benjamin before they are allowed in the hall ? Do they really write 8 or more exams with Latin terminology like Res Ipsa Loquitur ? Maybe the point is to run from law, constitutions and formality in the same way Benjamin Franklin ran from Anthony Johnson once while maintaining a window dressing of order; a semblance and pretence of normalcy. What is the point of Alexander Hamilton and his concerns about unscrupulous men if my dna has the authority? They should not make it soo obvious though, study a bit more and read the ILO Regulations R202 or else I will be very cross with them. Did you know a P and O Ferry would only take six hours to sail from New York to Nigeria? If the issue is identity for the leadership classes who tend to be related to some founding fathers who were once owned by a Black man like Anthony Johnson, then we accept this. But, every soul born in America by the year 1865 was part Amerindian. Every American really is part Amerindian. It may be hard to believe, but it's true. It could be Chihuahua people dna or Pueblos people dna or Mohican dna or Mohicanapanese.

Post a Comment