Posts
Latest Posts
JESUS CHRIST GOOD MAN Genre: Biblical Drama / Apocalyptic Philosophical Speculative Tone: Atmospheric, Reverent, Unforgivingly Stark LOGLINE Framed through the Gospel of Luke and centered on Christ’s core temptations and encounters with outcast souls, Jesus Christ Good Man weaves ancient scripture with a vision of human tragedy—culminating in a dialogue between Jesus and a ruined Canadian scientist whose corrupted nuclear energy plants destroyed the Earth. MAIN CHARACTERS Jesus of Nazareth: Gracious yet unyielding; a man of profound sorrow and absolute peace who honors human agency above all else. Dr. Arthur Vance: A brilliant, disgraced Canadian nuclear physicist who dropped out of academia to build cheap, unstable "false nuclear" plants along the Great Lakes, ultimately precipitating a global ecological collapse. The Adversary (Temptation): A quiet, persistent voice appearing throughout Jesus’ life, tempting him to bypass human free will and enforce divine control. The Woman at the Well (Photine): A Samaritan seeker whose dialogue bridges the ancient covenants with the living water. The Woman Taken in Adultery: A figure caught in religious legalism, through whom Jesus reveals the moral bankruptcy of self-righteous judgment. Click here.
The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. To find out if you are in the current of Royal Sheba or Bathsheba(agent of Mikhal), read Proverbs 2,5,6,7,9,11 and 12. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby, raise the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. This is the purposeful rhythm. Otherwise, you are always learning but not settled in this truth, this purposeful rhythm. You are then purposeless...the purposeless chica, the aimless chica. But how can we achieve this rhythm with a guy on board to help as the husband if we don't have sufficient income support money? Otherwise, she's not right....not in the holiday...not in the celebration. But if she is following the rhythm, then she is in the Hijab. She is covering children and is covered. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; with Jennifer Markham. The man says that if he put his finger in the nose...in the nose of one woman, the sensation on his finger is the same no matter what woman it is. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. Maybe she is in the aimlessness with five husbands and the one she is with is not her own. She should be content with the one husband since it's all the same like when a man sticks his finger in your nose. It's the same sensory experience for him and the woman no matter what woman it is. We just don't want any Babylonian woman impeaching the man or the children out of social competitions in the house space for her authority and Babylonian ascendancy. Monogamy may not be a natural culture as juxtaposed with the nomadic bush man neanderthal commune but it is what we have now and we call it the monogamous family unit. This exists in the bush man experience when a woman allows one male commune member to copulate with her once a month with no thought of who is who as brother or cousin, never the father, son or uncle, but if she is with any man twice over two months, then they have to leave the commune and separate by going to the monogamous culture of formalities in a township. This is because she has been taken as a spouse, a wife just as Pharaoh acknowledged Sarai as Abraham's wife. They leave the bush. Click here.
Click here. In the video A British Passport Doesn't Make You British produced by Freedom Watch GB, a representative from the youth initiative debates the definition of British national identity [00:00]. The core of the argument presented by the speaker is that being British is not merely a legal status conferred by holding a passport, but requires a "collective ancestry" rooted in the British Isles [00:10]. When challenged by a British-born interviewer whose parents were also born in the UK, the speaker maintains that legal citizenship ("on paper") differs from ancestral belonging [02:10]. Bringing the history of Cheddar Man and ancient genetics into this discussion highlights the scientific complexities surrounding concepts of "collective ancestry" and "indigenous" British identity
