Solved: This is all about Capitalism. The Russians had socioeconomic programs such as the universal unconditional minimum income support that preserve the consumers and also regular high levels of consumer activity whether or not there will be a new wave of job cutting automation. We are confident that there always will be a new time and energy saving implementation of job cutting new technological automation. However, we resented their lack of American style consumerism and choice of products on offer in Russia as symbolised in a wall that kept Western products out. That "wall" is removed. Russians can buy coca cola and Doritos and Pizza and Levi's and Nikes and Adidas. They build Mercedes in Russia. The rate of mortality whether or not they have ten brands of potato chips is ten times lower in Russia than in North America. They now have the ten brands of potato chips and bread and sodas and lots of stuff just like the North American with lots of American and Italian pizza and here we say the wall that held up the versatility and choice of goods in Russian consumerism called for by global capitalism has come down; more than 40 years ago now. However, there is a wall now in North America as the North Americans have a socioeconomic policy wall holding up global capitalism in that International global capitalism calls for a universal unconditional minimum income support to ensure high levels of market activity and enable the same type of recession proof Russian economy. This is what global capitalism wants and requires. This wall is evidenced and symbolised in the lack of this Universal unconditional minimum income support for every North American and is just as annoying to global capitalism as it was to see Russians block the sale of American branded other Western goods although everyone in Russia had good money as provided by their truly capitalist minded governrment with their socioeconomic programs with the universal minimum income support that support capitalism and the need for regular stable consumerism and the domestic consumer also whether or not a robotic system is about to cancel 70% of all industrial jobs in the world. The "wall" in terms of uncooperative, insufficient and frustrating socioeconomic programs that block the move of Capitalism are now required to come down. Mr. POTUS tear down these walls preventing the fulfilment of global capitalism and now enable a stable buoyant American market economy instead of your current iteration of Capitalism that involves consistent 40 or 50 year recessions. Your population is disappearing. Your market is receding. Your domestic economy is dying. You are a white nigger enjoying his game and self extermination as he sees his authority. You have to be the living dead. Tell us again that with all of your automation, your concern in 1959 s that machines do not buy vehicles? For real; shoo!!!! The resistance to a universal unconditional minimum income support stipend for every citizen does not mean you cannot have a job; with the stipend. Some programs in North America have conditions. Some programs in North America do not have conditions. All European programs are unconditional. All Asian programs are unconditional; like Oxygen. We can accept that areas where there is no commensurate program equal to or better than the program in Massachusetts, Vermont or Holland or Norway or Japan or England are areas where a certain problem temperament or problem motivation or human evolutionary problem exists in cobwebbing the civic administration in that Region. Boston has a programme as situated in Massachusetts. Boston is a very very large North American city; about the size of New York; dog. Shoo!! So, we cannot allow people with an evolutionary problem to block economic progress. The importance of a universal minimum income support stipend is quite understandable in the reality of on-going job automation and industrial automation. The average North American wants a universal unconditional minimum income support just like what is enjoyed by citizens in Massachusetts, Japan, Vermont, China and Germany. The only condition is that you are a citizen of Japan, Norway or the country that provides you the income support stipend. Would you let a bunch of hungry, starving North American Neanderthals hold up the move of Capitalism and civilization that calls for a universal unconditional minimum income support for every citizen? We do need people though; as consumers. We need all kinds of people and most Hunan beings represent a hybridization in the human experience. We all know sushi, Darth Vader, the Hamburger and James Bond. Most human beings can speak English. Yet there are more English only speaking human beings per capita who do not have a universal unconditional minimum income support. All of these people are citizens of North America. This group is a dying minority. You need company Christopher; people like you. Are you engineering a false economy crisis? You have a solution. Whether the American population lives or dies is not irrelevant. But, as an emotional concern, they are irrelevant as anything but occupants of the North American territory and as happy consumers in that territory killing each other for feelings of respect and maybe they will be consumers no where else. Did you here Columbus' greatest weakness is that he was a hypochondriac? The nations and businesses lending money to the US government need to get their money back from these trillion dollar loans to America and the US fiscal policies must humbly reflect the fact that America is...Pompeii and in need of management. The Oklahoma Grendel or Ray from Ozark or Ray from Clarendon Jamaica is not new to us in his unwillingness to be thankful as he evolves into new expectations of himself in this world; new expectations about ownership and ownership of property as well as the efficacy of a new mandatory military school with a good unconditional Minimum income support to effect his purpose as that territorial occupant and consumer that we need to buy the pizzas, the chicken dinners and the vehicles as well as pay the rents on old and brand spanking new 4 bed homes or old homes and old apartments or brand new condos. Use them to occupy the territory and to function as necessary participants in the economy. A universal unconditional minimum income support of $70000.00 USD per year is ideal. Don't you intend to steal the money back from these sods as the sophisticated 13 colonialists when you know they don't really believe in mortgages or buying and selling property and fraudulently using these people is a sport to you; right? All you need them for is to turn the money over and the machine made products also. The Asian human buying food and clothing in America is not a robot. He is a being that aids the evidently recessing economy as opposed to an actual growing North American economy in his consumer power as a citizen of a "universal unconditional minimum income support" adherent Asian nation. He is not a citizen of America. FSJ.

 
Solved:  

  1. This is all about Capitalism.  The Russians had socioeconomic programs such as the universal unconditional minimum income support that preserve the consumers and also regular high levels of consumer activity whether or not there will be a new wave of job cutting automation. We are confident that there always will be a new time and energy saving implementation of job cutting  new technological automation.  However, we resented their lack of  American style consumerism and choice of products on offer in Russia  as symbolised in a wall that kept Western products out.  
That "wall" is removed.  Russians can buy coca cola and Doritos and Pizza and Levi's and Nikes and Adidas.  They build Mercedes in Russia.  The rate of mortality whether or not they have ten brands of potato chips is ten times lower in Russia than in North America. They now have the ten brands of potato chips and bread  and sodas and lots of stuff just like the North American with lots of American and Italian  pizza and here we say the wall that held up the versatility and choice of goods in  Russian consumerism called for by  global capitalism has come down; more than 40 years ago  now.  However, there is a wall now in North America as the North Americans have a  socioeconomic policy wall holding up global capitalism in that International global capitalism calls for a universal unconditional minimum income support to ensure high levels of market activity and enable the same type of recession proof Russian economy. This is what global capitalism wants and requires.    This wall is evidenced and symbolised in the lack of this Universal unconditional minimum income support for every North American and is just as annoying to global capitalism as it was to see Russians block the sale of American branded other Western goods although everyone in Russia had good money as provided by their truly capitalist minded governrment with their socioeconomic programs with the universal minimum income support that support capitalism and the need for regular stable consumerism and the domestic consumer also  whether or not a robotic system is about to cancel 70% of all industrial jobs in the world.  

The "wall" in terms of uncooperative, insufficient and frustrating socioeconomic programs that block the move of Capitalism are now required to come down.  Mr. POTUS  tear down these walls preventing the fulfilment of global capitalism and now enable a stable buoyant  American market economy instead of your current iteration of Capitalism that involves consistent 40 or 50 year recessions. Your population is disappearing. Your market is receding. Your domestic economy is dying.   You are a white nigger enjoying his game and self extermination as he sees his authority.  You have to be the living dead. Tell us again that with all of your automation, your concern in 1959 s that machines do not buy vehicles?  For real; shoo!!!! 
 


The resistance to a universal unconditional minimum income support stipend for every citizen does not mean you cannot have a job; with the stipend. Some programs in North America have conditions.  Some programs in North America do not have conditions.  All European programs are unconditional.  All Asian programs are unconditional; like Oxygen.  We can accept that areas where there is no commensurate program equal to or better than the program in Massachusetts, Vermont or Holland or Norway or Japan or England are areas where a certain problem temperament or problem motivation or human  evolutionary problem exists in cobwebbing the civic administration in that Region. Boston has a programme as situated in Massachusetts. Boston is a very very large North American  city; about the size of New York; dog. Shoo!!
So, we cannot allow people with an evolutionary problem to block economic progress.  The importance of a universal minimum income support stipend is quite understandable in the reality of on-going job automation  and industrial automation. The average North American wants a universal unconditional minimum income support just like what is enjoyed by citizens in Massachusetts, Japan, Vermont, China and Germany.  The only condition is that you are a citizen of Japan, Norway or the country that provides you the income support stipend.  

Would you let a bunch of hungry, starving North American Neanderthals hold up the move of Capitalism and civilization that calls for a universal unconditional minimum income support for every citizen?    We do need people though; as consumers. We need all kinds of people and most Hunan beings represent a hybridization in the human experience.  We all know sushi, Darth Vader, the Hamburger and James Bond. Most human beings can speak English. Yet there are more English only speaking  human beings per capita  who do not have a universal unconditional minimum income support.  All of these people are citizens of North America.  This group is a dying minority.   

   You need company Christopher; people like you. Are you engineering a false economy crisis?   You have a solution. Whether the American population lives or dies is not irrelevant. But, as an emotional concern, they are irrelevant as anything but occupants of the North American territory and as happy  consumers in that territory killing each other for feelings of  respect and maybe they will be consumers no where else. 
Did you here Columbus' greatest weakness is that he was a hypochondriac?  

   The nations and businesses lending money to the US government need to get their money back from these trillion dollar loans to America and the US fiscal policies must humbly reflect the fact that America is...Pompeii and in need of management. The Oklahoma Grendel or Ray from Ozark or Ray from Clarendon Jamaica is not new to us in  his unwillingness to be thankful as he evolves into new expectations of himself in this world; new expectations about ownership and ownership of property as well as the efficacy of a new mandatory military school with a good unconditional Minimum income support to effect his purpose as that territorial occupant and consumer that we need to buy the pizzas, the chicken dinners and the vehicles as well as pay the rents on old and brand spanking new 4 bed homes or old homes and old apartments or brand new condos.   Use them to occupy the territory and to function as necessary participants in the economy. A universal unconditional minimum income support of $70000.00 USD per year is ideal.  Don't you intend to steal the money back from these sods as the sophisticated 13 colonialists when you know they don't really believe in mortgages or buying and selling property and fraudulently using these people is a sport to you; right?     All you need them for is to turn the money over and the machine made products also.  The Asian human buying food and clothing in America is not a robot. He is a being that aids the evidently recessing  economy as opposed to an actual  growing North American economy in his consumer power as a citizen of a "universal unconditional minimum income support" adherent Asian nation. He is not a citizen of America.     

FSJ. 
 
 
 
 
 

Comments

Popular Posts

The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. To find out if you are in the current of Royal Sheba or Bathsheba(agent of Mikhal), read Proverbs 2,5,6,7,9,11 and 12. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby, raise the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. This is the purposeful rhythm. Otherwise, you are always learning but not settled in this truth, this purposeful rhythm. You are then purposeless...the purposeless chica, the aimless chica. But how can we achieve this rhythm with a guy on board to help as the husband if we don't have sufficient income support money? Otherwise, she's not right....not in the holiday...not in the celebration. But if she is following the rhythm, then she is in the Hijab. She is covering children and is covered. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; with Jennifer Markham. The man says that if he put his finger in the nose...in the nose of one woman, the sensation on his finger is the same no matter what woman it is. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. Maybe she is in the aimlessness with five husbands and the one she is with is not her own. She should be content with the one husband since it's all the same like when a man sticks his finger in your nose. It's the same sensory experience for him and the woman no matter what woman it is. We just don't want any Babylonian woman impeaching the man or the children out of social competitions in the house space for her authority and Babylonian ascendancy. Monogamy may not be a natural culture as juxtaposed with the nomadic bush man neanderthal commune but it is what we have now and we call it the monogamous family unit. This exists in the bush man experience when a woman allows one male commune member to copulate with her once a month with no thought of who is who as brother or cousin, never the father, son or uncle, but if she is with any man twice over two months, then they have to leave the commune and separate by going to the monogamous culture of formalities in a township. This is because she has been taken as a spouse, a wife just as Pharaoh acknowledged Sarai as Abraham's wife. They leave the bush. Click here.