When I was a child...I was a child without education. When I was a child with education I was a Samurai or building owner waiting to express my abilities. Then I became a man at the town fair with Paula Rhone and then we had five children. We bought our building with a small loan backed with the great grand family farm and the basic income paid the rent. All the tenants..building fully occupied had basic income...in Manitoba....I mean Minnesota. But, my cousin with no education stole the bank in the small town after killing the manager...took the keys to the vault. He had his children too at the Town fair one night with an Abigail Holstar. Nine years later, he bought a building also and aspired to politics. He won and then cancelled the basic income when he did not understand it but kept doing what he felt was necessary to feel at the station of success he imagined for himself..as an Aspiring man named Senatogann Cools.It was a human rights violation contrary to UN Charter and also a breach of domestic criminal law in Canada and the United States. He was shot while in office but then the cops put in a lookalike who was really a sex operation and he / she had his own shim agenda....a ha ha ha ha ha!!! He turned economic peace into a world wind. The tenants got into desperate businesses to make the rent payment, robbed the bank and then the bank he relied on was not so secure with much of the client's deposits going out the door as robberies. He reduced the level of educational attainment per capita so that he might feel equal to others in public and was not able to work out more complete and beneficial solutions to satisfy his need to feel successful in his station in life due to the evident fact that he reasoned like a child in his own lack of education. The basic income was used to shore up the banks while the buildings emptied out from 70% occupancy on average down to 10% occupancy and stayed empty and the population decreased when people moved to regions with leadership that complied with the basic income policy as the desperation in the absence of basic income became bank robberies and other illegal behaviour that turned into potential intersections with the authority and he was able to decide who to arrest from day to day. These desperate transactions were illegal cash transactions usually in an unseen cash-only economy. There will always be a cash economy but when people have basic income it generates all kinds of transactions usually out of convenience and they are monitorable, usually electronic, immediate revenue generating transactions for the government. You could not travel very far and you never know when they might come for you! When you think like a child and reason like a child with solutions that are befitting a child with your lack of education, then your solutions are quite often incomplete, emotional and childish and not befitting an adult who has more information to engineer proper, complete and personally beneficial solutions.

When I was a child...I was a child without education. When I was a child with education I was a Samurai or building owner waiting to express my abilities. Then I became a man at the town fair with Paula Rhone and then we had five children. We bought our building with a small loan backed with the great grand  family farm  and the basic income paid the rent. All the tenants..building fully occupied  had basic income...in Manitoba....I mean Minnesota.  But, my cousin with no education stole the bank in the small town after killing the manager...took the keys to the vault. He had his children too at the Town fair one night with an Abigail Holstar.  Nine years later, he bought a building also and aspired to politics.  He won and 
then cancelled the basic income when he did not understand it but kept doing what he felt was necessary to feel at the station of  success he imagined for himself..as an Aspiring man named Senatogann Cools.It was a human rights violation contrary to UN Charter and also a breach of domestic criminal law in Canada and the United States. He was shot while in office but then the cops put in a lookalike who was really a sex operation and he / she had his own shim agenda....a ha ha ha ha ha!!!  He turned economic peace into a world wind. The tenants got into desperate businesses to make the rent payment, robbed the bank and then the bank he relied on was not so secure with much of the client's deposits going out the door as robberies. He reduced the level of educational attainment per capita so that he might feel equal to others in public and was not able to work out more complete and beneficial solutions to satisfy his need to feel successful in his station in life due to the evident fact that he reasoned like a child in his own lack of education.  The basic income was used to shore up the banks while the buildings emptied out from 70% occupancy on average down to 10% occupancy and  stayed empty and the population decreased when people moved to regions with leadership that complied with the basic income policy  as the desperation in the absence of basic income became bank robberies and other illegal behaviour that turned into potential intersections with the  authority and he was able to decide who to arrest from day to day. These desperate transactions were illegal cash transactions usually in an unseen cash-only economy. There will always be a cash economy but when people have basic income it generates all kinds of transactions usually out of convenience and they are monitorable, usually electronic,  immediate  revenue generating transactions for the government.  You could not travel very far and you never know when they might come for you!  When you think like a child and reason like a child with solutions that are befitting a child with your lack of education, then your solutions are quite often incomplete, emotional and childish and not befitting an adult who has more information to engineer proper, complete and personally  beneficial solutions. 

Comments

Popular Posts

The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. To find out if you are in the current of Royal Sheba or Bathsheba(agent of Mikhal), read Proverbs 2,5,6,7,9,11 and 12. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby, raise the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. This is the purposeful rhythm. Otherwise, you are always learning but not settled in this truth, this purposeful rhythm. You are then purposeless...the purposeless chica, the aimless chica. But how can we achieve this rhythm with a guy on board to help as the husband if we don't have sufficient income support money? Otherwise, she's not right....not in the holiday...not in the celebration. But if she is following the rhythm, then she is in the Hijab. She is covering children and is covered. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; with Jennifer Markham. The man says that if he put his finger in the nose...in the nose of one woman, the sensation on his finger is the same no matter what woman it is. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. Maybe she is in the aimlessness with five husbands and the one she is with is not her own. She should be content with the one husband since it's all the same like when a man sticks his finger in your nose. It's the same sensory experience for him and the woman no matter what woman it is. We just don't want any Babylonian woman impeaching the man or the children out of social competitions in the house space for her authority and Babylonian ascendancy. Monogamy may not be a natural culture as juxtaposed with the nomadic bush man neanderthal commune but it is what we have now and we call it the monogamous family unit. This exists in the bush man experience when a woman allows one male commune member to copulate with her once a month with no thought of who is who as brother or cousin, never the father, son or uncle, but if she is with any man twice over two months, then they have to leave the commune and separate by going to the monogamous culture of formalities in a township. This is because she has been taken as a spouse, a wife just as Pharaoh acknowledged Sarai as Abraham's wife. They leave the bush. Click here.