The A*shole says he would rather look at 2.8 trillion dollars collecting 2 % on international markets and pretend the money is his instead of owning buildings and managing the money by putting the fraction of $40,000.00 per citizen into the population 's hands where he, as a building owner, can benefit personally as an owner of 700 apartment units collecting $1000.00/ per month. That works out to $700,000.00 per month in personal wealth when the average citizen can afford consistently that rent. The government collects $200.00 per month on the total payment of $1200.00 if the tax is 20%. The US is paying Russia $3 billion a year and they have been doing so since 1990. They still pay Europe $20 billion dollars and these payments have been made consistently since 1948. If this faithfulness in payment for any purpose is to be maintained, the North American needs to respect one factor in all economies whether or not you are a manufacturing economy. It is the industry that internal market consumption represents to any national economy vs. Exports. It is also the most important industry to any nation and is not unlike the Money market loan industry. The Russian bread lines on TV were fictional while it gave the American population the sense of hegemony they wanted. But, a bank robbery or a bread line are equivalent in terms of market malfides and the unutilized purpose of the human being as consumers to generate ROI such that a little money lent to the system in the hands of the consumer generates immediate return for the government on every sale of bread and other goods; in particular gasoline. Money market loans earn around 2 percent per day. Sales tax at 19-20 percent is an essential means of commercial revenue for the government and it precludes the consumer market weakness that the Russians were believed to have suffered comparatively speaking during the era of the USSR yet it is what America suffers today in the absence of consistent "across the board" basic income regardless of complexion for every American. This is following the cessation of manufacturing of nearly all consumer goods in America pursuant to the "Adam Smith" model of economies of scale that said America was best to leave the manufacturing of goods to Asian countries who were more efficient but the evidence says the Asians were more efficient only because they respected the "Adam Smith" model to apply the most efficient technique with robotic labor to be, as the logic of endeavour requires, efficient as noted again by Adam Smith. In the unusual hesitation to fulfill this requisite policy maybe they will move all the Cherokee with Afros this time to Belize where they will have a basic income from a UN compliant nation or to beautiful Gambia or Kenya where they will have a basic income as citizens resident in a compliant UN nation or to the Republic of Ireland where they will receive basic income as returning Black Irish in some cases with no hesitation and they might return to America as grand parents with their children and grand children as African Muslims to enjoy the 60 year old Mosque in New Jersey and their grand children will have to run to Minnesota or New York for basic income. Kenya is nice you see... Nuh true!

The A*shole says he would rather look at 2.8 trillion dollars collecting 2 % on international markets and pretend the money is his instead of owning buildings and managing the money by putting the fraction of $40,000.00 per citizen into the population 's hands where he, as a building owner,  can benefit personally as an owner of 700 apartment units collecting $1000.00/ per month. That works out to $700,000.00 per month in personal wealth when the average citizen can afford consistently that rent. The government collects $200.00 per month on the total payment of $1200.00 if the tax is 20%. The US is paying Russia $3 billion  a year and they have been doing so since 1990.  They still pay Europe $20 billion dollars and these payments have been made consistently since 1948.  If this faithfulness in payment for any purpose is to be maintained, the North American needs to respect one factor in all economies whether or not you are a manufacturing economy.  It is the industry that internal market consumption represents to any national economy vs. Exports. It is also the most important industry to any nation and is not unlike the Money market loan industry. The Russian  bread lines on TV were fictional while it gave the American population the sense of hegemony they wanted. But, a bank robbery or a bread line are equivalent in terms of market malfides and the unutilized purpose  of the human being as consumers to generate ROI such that a little money lent to the system in the hands of the consumer generates immediate return for the government on every sale of bread and other goods; in particular gasoline. Money market loans earn around 2 percent per day.  Sales tax at 19-20 percent is an essential means of commercial revenue for the government and it precludes the  consumer market weakness that the Russians were believed to have  suffered comparatively speaking during the era of the USSR  yet it is what America suffers today in the absence of consistent "across the board" basic income regardless of complexion for every American. This is following the cessation of manufacturing of nearly all consumer goods in America pursuant to the "Adam Smith" model of economies of scale that said America was best to leave the manufacturing of goods to Asian countries who were more efficient but the evidence  says the Asians  were more efficient only because they respected the "Adam Smith" model to apply the most efficient technique with robotic labor to be, as the logic of endeavour requires, efficient as noted again by Adam Smith.   In the unusual hesitation to fulfill this requisite policy  maybe they will move all the Cherokee with Afros this time  to Belize where they will  have a basic income from a UN compliant nation  or to beautiful Gambia or Kenya where they will have a basic income as citizens resident in a compliant UN nation or to the Republic of Ireland where they will receive basic income as returning Black Irish in some cases  with no hesitation and they might return to America as grand parents with their children and grand children as African Muslims to enjoy the 60 year old Mosque in New Jersey and their grand children will have to run to Minnesota or New York for basic income. Kenya is nice you see... Nuh true! 

Comments

Popular Posts

The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. To find out if you are in the current of Royal Sheba or Bathsheba(agent of Mikhal), read Proverbs 2,5,6,7,9,11 and 12. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby, raise the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. This is the purposeful rhythm. Otherwise, you are always learning but not settled in this truth, this purposeful rhythm. You are then purposeless...the purposeless chica, the aimless chica. But how can we achieve this rhythm with a guy on board to help as the husband if we don't have sufficient income support money? Otherwise, she's not right....not in the holiday...not in the celebration. But if she is following the rhythm, then she is in the Hijab. She is covering children and is covered. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; with Jennifer Markham. The man says that if he put his finger in the nose...in the nose of one woman, the sensation on his finger is the same no matter what woman it is. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. Maybe she is in the aimlessness with five husbands and the one she is with is not her own. She should be content with the one husband since it's all the same like when a man sticks his finger in your nose. It's the same sensory experience for him and the woman no matter what woman it is. We just don't want any Babylonian woman impeaching the man or the children out of social competitions in the house space for her authority and Babylonian ascendancy. Monogamy may not be a natural culture as juxtaposed with the nomadic bush man neanderthal commune but it is what we have now and we call it the monogamous family unit. This exists in the bush man experience when a woman allows one male commune member to copulate with her once a month with no thought of who is who as brother or cousin, never the father, son or uncle, but if she is with any man twice over two months, then they have to leave the commune and separate by going to the monogamous culture of formalities in a township. This is because she has been taken as a spouse, a wife just as Pharaoh acknowledged Sarai as Abraham's wife. They leave the bush. Click here.