Even if you leave the EU, you have an on going UN obligation or common law obligation to the refugee as seen in Somerset and Stewart. You communicate or propagate a less magnanimous rendition of authority; that is a return to an experience with authority familiar to the Latino Anglo it would seem where authority was abusive and inconsistent as levied by some other kind of Anglos; maybe English Bob or Prophet Josiah; I don't know. But, it seems you are spinning around the issue of white while the principles of the received culture are magnanimous and colourless but they do not always meet with precise application in the authority exercised by an Anglo who was also usually white. But the official answer of the colorless authority exercising colorless principle is evident. A magnanimous, kingly white would never think of exterminating the non white but only the slave white would it would seem; the "19 crime" jettisoned European population. There are magnanimous black people in this world also who have no mind toward revenge against any other complexion but propagate the universal non racialised answer that helps all and that a white school teacher could manage with sufficient school supplies or people supplies as in basic income. The logic of Brexit would have to be peace and that peace is magnanimous and white or magnanimous and black but magnanimous regardless. If not, then it is mean, resistant, resentful and backward. It is vendetta. It is slavic. It is the indentured servant looking for a memorial in accordance with Deuteronomy 15 vs. 12-17 above and beyond the equanimity of basic income that may not precisely acknowledge the debt owed to his ancestry. The hesitation as to the UDHR must be, instead of quiet, the opportunity that exists for the continued discussion about sins suffered but not addressed. It is also an opportunity for determined late arrivals to our civilization to challenge ownership of property although such challenge is immediate incarceration for an indictable offense but maybe you will get to be a pet android assigned to watching and protecting property for the next 100 years; a rather ironic role for the resistant peoples on our society; not necessarily from Goat Island. There are several rather law abiding people from Goat Island in our community regardless of complexion. It is Davido Camerlon who initiated the fiasco as a grandson of Goebbells who has worked to distract the Briton from the obvious solution to its dwindling sense of dignity ; that answer being an article 25 commensurate amount of basic income. He promoted austerity instead. Firage...and May are the continuation of the mirage. Je suis tres desole'.

Even if you leave the EU, you have an on going UN obligation or common law obligation to the refugee as seen in Somerset and Stewart. You communicate  or  propagate a less magnanimous  rendition of authority; that is a  return to an experience with authority familiar to the Latino Anglo it would seem where authority was  abusive and inconsistent as levied by some other kind of  Anglos; maybe English Bob or Prophet Josiah; I don't know.    But, it seems you are spinning around the issue of white while the principles of the received culture are magnanimous and colourless but they do not always meet with precise application in the authority exercised  by an Anglo who was also usually white. But the official answer of the colorless  authority  exercising colorless principle is evident.  A magnanimous, kingly white would never think of exterminating the non white but only the slave white would it would seem; the "19 crime" jettisoned European population.   There are  magnanimous black people in this world also who have no mind toward revenge against any other complexion but propagate  the universal non racialised answer that helps all and that a white school teacher could manage with sufficient school supplies or people supplies as in basic income. The logic of Brexit would have to be peace and that peace is magnanimous and white or magnanimous and  black but magnanimous regardless.  If not, then it is mean, resistant, resentful and backward.  It is vendetta.  It is slavic. It is the indentured servant looking for a memorial in accordance with Deuteronomy 15 vs. 12-17 above and beyond the equanimity of basic income that may not precisely acknowledge the debt owed to his ancestry.  The hesitation as to the UDHR must be, instead of quiet,  the opportunity that  exists  for the continued discussion about sins suffered  but not addressed.  It is also an opportunity for determined late arrivals to our civilization to challenge ownership of property although such challenge is immediate incarceration for an indictable offense but maybe you will get to be a pet android assigned to watching and protecting property for the next 100 years; a rather ironic role for the resistant peoples on our society; not necessarily from Goat Island. There are several rather law abiding people from Goat Island in our community regardless of complexion.    It  is Davido Camerlon who initiated the fiasco as a grandson of Goebbells who has worked to distract the Briton from the obvious solution to its dwindling sense of dignity ; that answer being an article 25 commensurate amount of basic income. He promoted austerity instead. Firage...and May are the continuation of the mirage.    Je suis tres desole'.

Comments

Popular Posts

The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. To find out if you are in the current of Royal Sheba or Bathsheba(agent of Mikhal), read Proverbs 2,5,6,7,9,11 and 12. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby, raise the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. This is the purposeful rhythm. Otherwise, you are always learning but not settled in this truth, this purposeful rhythm. You are then purposeless...the purposeless chica, the aimless chica. But how can we achieve this rhythm with a guy on board to help as the husband if we don't have sufficient income support money? Otherwise, she's not right....not in the holiday...not in the celebration. But if she is following the rhythm, then she is in the Hijab. She is covering children and is covered. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; with Jennifer Markham. The man says that if he put his finger in the nose...in the nose of one woman, the sensation on his finger is the same no matter what woman it is. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. Maybe she is in the aimlessness with five husbands and the one she is with is not her own. She should be content with the one husband since it's all the same like when a man sticks his finger in your nose. It's the same sensory experience for him and the woman no matter what woman it is. We just don't want any Babylonian woman impeaching the man or the children out of social competitions in the house space for her authority and Babylonian ascendancy. Monogamy may not be a natural culture as juxtaposed with the nomadic bush man neanderthal commune but it is what we have now and we call it the monogamous family unit. This exists in the bush man experience when a woman allows one male commune member to copulate with her once a month with no thought of who is who as brother or cousin, never the father, son or uncle, but if she is with any man twice over two months, then they have to leave the commune and separate by going to the monogamous culture of formalities in a township. This is because she has been taken as a spouse, a wife just as Pharaoh acknowledged Sarai as Abraham's wife. They leave the bush. Click here.