It is not to happen yet but you need to understand causality. It is not to happen yet since it would be waste of a big market; uninhabitable for a very long time but the idea is to gas all of North America and free every citizen from the debilitating idiocy of race and their bodies of the skin and their minds from the drugs that make them diffident and unwilling to agree with the multi-complexined and capable known history of the world. Then, turn them all into service androids regardless of complexion since they do not beieve they are worth basic income for consumption of finished robotically made goods while the robots and the machines will work 7 days a week and 24 hours a day as they are doing this right now. But, this is just a movie plot really and remember the desert of the real is focused on the Ango world and Anglo diffidence with Ireland and Scotland as the exception. Then, you will see a replacement of the population with other human beings who have agreed with the role of the human in the automated economy with robotic, automated production that serves human beings who are provided by their society with monies called basic income for the consumption of finished goods. The new North Americans are already on the way from Asia and India; some of them actually Amerindian but now with Asian languages and Asian looks; you see? This is just a movie plot though. You saw it in the Matrix although it was some what veiled. But, with a market worth soo much and the continent legally obligated to facilitate and implement basic income to further the globalism in economies the continent help to uh erect, then there is no need to kill of a population of happy consumers who will buy the goods made not only in Asia but also in North America. The North American goods should be the same cost in spite of the goods being made in greater quantity in Asia since there is no international shipping cost and the tariffs could help restart North American industrial production except that the tariffs on the chips made only Asia might make it too expensive and what does it really matter if its only a $200.00 tv if it is made in Asia or America or a $1.00 screw driver when Asians and Americans have basic income and why would any body argue with a universal basic income policy already in effect in Asia and Germany .


It is not to happen yet but you need to understand causality. It is not to happen yet since it would be waste of a big market; uninhabitable for a very long time but the idea is to gas all of North America  and free  every citizen from the debilitating idiocy of race and  their bodies of the skin and their minds from the drugs that make them diffident and unwilling to agree with the multi-complexined and capable known history of the world. Then, turn them all into service androids regardless of complexion since they do not beieve they are worth basic income for consumption of finished robotically made goods while the robots and the machines will work 7 days a week and 24 hours a day as they are doing this right now. But, this is just a movie plot really and remember the desert of the real is focused on the Ango world and Anglo diffidence with Ireland  and Scotland as the exception. Then, you will see a replacement of the population with other human beings who have agreed with the role of the human in the automated economy  with robotic, automated production that serves human beings who are provided by their society  with monies called basic income for the consumption of finished goods.  The new North Americans are already on the way from Asia and India; some of them actually Amerindian but now with Asian languages and Asian looks; you see?  This is just a movie plot though. You saw  it  in the Matrix although it was some what veiled.  But, with a market worth soo much and the continent legally obligated to facilitate and implement basic income to further the globalism in economies the continent help to uh erect, then there is no need to kill of a population of happy consumers who will buy the goods made not only in Asia but also in North America. The North American goods should be the same cost in spite of the goods being made in greater quantity in Asia since there is no international  shipping cost and the tariffs could help restart North American industrial production except that the tariffs on the chips made only Asia might make it too expensive and what does it really matter if its only a $200.00 tv if it is made in Asia or America or a $1.00 screw driver when Asians and Americans have basic income and why would any body argue with a universal basic income policy already in effect in Asia and Germany . 

Comments

Popular Posts

The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. To find out if you are in the current of Royal Sheba or Bathsheba(agent of Mikhal), read Proverbs 2,5,6,7,9,11 and 12. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby, raise the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. This is the purposeful rhythm. Otherwise, you are always learning but not settled in this truth, this purposeful rhythm. You are then purposeless...the purposeless chica, the aimless chica. But how can we achieve this rhythm with a guy on board to help as the husband if we don't have sufficient income support money? Otherwise, she's not right....not in the holiday...not in the celebration. But if she is following the rhythm, then she is in the Hijab. She is covering children and is covered. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; with Jennifer Markham. The man says that if he put his finger in the nose...in the nose of one woman, the sensation on his finger is the same no matter what woman it is. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. Maybe she is in the aimlessness with five husbands and the one she is with is not her own. She should be content with the one husband since it's all the same like when a man sticks his finger in your nose. It's the same sensory experience for him and the woman no matter what woman it is. We just don't want any Babylonian woman impeaching the man or the children out of social competitions in the house space for her authority and Babylonian ascendancy. Monogamy may not be a natural culture as juxtaposed with the nomadic bush man neanderthal commune but it is what we have now and we call it the monogamous family unit. This exists in the bush man experience when a woman allows one male commune member to copulate with her once a month with no thought of who is who as brother or cousin, never the father, son or uncle, but if she is with any man twice over two months, then they have to leave the commune and separate by going to the monogamous culture of formalities in a township. This is because she has been taken as a spouse, a wife just as Pharaoh acknowledged Sarai as Abraham's wife. They leave the bush. Click here.