Automation reduces the need for human labor but it does not reduce the human in terms of value; no! The only people trifling with human value following automation is the Anglo Brit or the Anglo Merican and this is causing some kind of palpitation. But, human value is consumption. The machines cannot fulfil this function in the economy and with the trillions saved on labor in terms of cost and actual quality in productivity with the fixed labor cost that will flow through the company's books for about 150 years, you see how the cost of the product has fallen. So, a few billion put toward human consumption satisfies the industrialists investment and purpose. The real truth is that, we may sit down one day and enjoy a symphony performed by Asimo robots. We may see robots defend people in court wearing grey plastic or purple plastic. We may see robotic Prosecutors. The point is that until that day and even during its alto solo, we would require people who can confirm the result as being correct according to law. The robot is of no value before the Court's Coat of Arms unless it has the requisite understanding or else it could really hurt the Court's function along with those that are invited to be victims of those who only seek attention before the hallowed, sacred and reverential shield. A degree paper does not make one a lawyer and you could be really white but it is only paper and the paper on its own is not form and function and nor is it understanding. The music degree paper does not enable you to play music but presumedly after 3 years studying music, you should be able to play a particular instrument and perform musically quite well. Be honest if you don't see that the degree papers are not handed out to people who were also not obligated to apply and the school was not obligated to accept them but it was an effort made by an applicant and the school's are happy when positive students actually do graduate and this entire process should not be devalued for those who live but who were born and will die as outsiders to simple truth in human value or the beauty of communal association and service as maybe they really do not see themselves as having any human value above and beyond their gloried complexion and the world has no time for their imposition of ignorance. Just do something; maybe be a school teacher or find a soul within you that can sit down for three years and digest several Judges names in time for your exams where you will say from memory, '..according to Lord Reid, it was held....and According to Lord Millet, Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Denning, Lord Diplock, Lord Scarman, Lord Buckmaster.' So please find your soul first and I am sure the Coat of Arms will be pleased with you in what you find in all submission and reverence to the LORD. You are accepted! He loves you as you are. You see, one is the hand, one is the eye, one is the nose but all are a part of the body of....Christ or the Leviathan if you wish and you need to function with soul. Then, we are happy and see good justice; not local or provincial rebellion and anarchy and then we are saved with so great a salvation.

Automation reduces the need for human labor but it does not reduce the human in terms of value; no! The only people trifling with human value following automation is the Anglo Brit or the Anglo Merican and this is causing some kind of palpitation. But, human value is consumption. The machines cannot fulfil this function in the economy and with the trillions saved on labor in terms of cost and actual quality in productivity with the fixed labor cost that will flow through the company's books for about 150 years,  you see how the cost of the product has fallen. So, a few billion put toward human consumption satisfies the industrialists investment and purpose.  The real truth is that, we may sit down one day and enjoy a symphony performed by Asimo robots.  We may see robots defend people in court wearing grey plastic or purple plastic. We may see robotic Prosecutors.  The point is that until that day and even during its alto solo, we would require people who can confirm the result as being correct according to law.  The robot is of no value before the Court's Coat of Arms unless it has the requisite understanding or else it could really hurt the Court's function along with those that are invited to be victims of those who only seek attention before the hallowed, sacred  and reverential shield. A degree paper does not make one a lawyer and you could be really white but it is only paper and the paper on its own is not form and function and nor is it understanding.  The music degree paper does not enable you to play music but presumedly after 3 years studying music, you should be able to play a particular instrument  and perform musically quite well. Be honest if you don't see that the degree papers are not handed out to people who were also not obligated to apply and the school was not obligated to accept them but it was an effort made by an applicant and the school's are happy when positive students actually do graduate and this entire process should not be devalued for those who live but who were born and will die as outsiders to simple truth in human value or the beauty of communal association and service as maybe they really do not see themselves as having any human value above and beyond their gloried complexion and the world has no time for their imposition of ignorance. Just do something; maybe be a school teacher or find a soul within you that can sit down for three years and digest several Judges names in time for your exams where you will say from memory, '..according to Lord Reid, it was held....and According to Lord Millet, Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Denning,  Lord Diplock, Lord Scarman, Lord Buckmaster.'  So please find your soul first and I am sure the Coat of Arms will be pleased with you in what you find in all submission and reverence to the LORD.   You are accepted! He loves you as you are.  You see, one is the hand, one is the eye, one is the nose but all are a part of the body of....Christ or the Leviathan if you wish and you need to function with soul. Then, we are happy and see good justice; not local or provincial rebellion and anarchy and then we are saved with so great a salvation.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

The Woman at the Well and the Proverbs 31 Woman. July 15th 2026. To find out if you are in the current of Royal Sheba or Bathsheba(agent of Mikhal), read Proverbs 2,5,6,7,9,11 and 12. The Hijab wins. The Hijab is really about the purpose; the purpose of the woman in the civilisations. She builds by having and formally naming the baby. Then we feed the baby, raise the baby and then bring the baby to the teaching. We need a woman, a chick with this rhythm; strictly rhythm. This is the purposeful rhythm. Otherwise, you are always learning but not settled in this truth, this purposeful rhythm. You are then purposeless...the purposeless chica, the aimless chica. But how can we achieve this rhythm with a guy on board to help as the husband if we don't have sufficient income support money? Otherwise, she's not right....not in the holiday...not in the celebration. But if she is following the rhythm, then she is in the Hijab. She is covering children and is covered. This makes her an undercover Puritan or a secular Hijab. We are all Space Ship attendants. By Natalie Shouldnow, Missy Peart, Tina Gackleman, Santo Madre; with Jennifer Markham. The man says that if he put his finger in the nose...in the nose of one woman, the sensation on his finger is the same no matter what woman it is. There are female characters in the bible. How does the woman at the well with Jesus contrast with the Proverbs 31 woman? The one in chapter 31 has just the one husband who is hers. The other has had five and the one she is currently with is not her own. Maybe she was busy being a surrogate mother. Maybe she is in the aimlessness with five husbands and the one she is with is not her own. She should be content with the one husband since it's all the same like when a man sticks his finger in your nose. It's the same sensory experience for him and the woman no matter what woman it is. We just don't want any Babylonian woman impeaching the man or the children out of social competitions in the house space for her authority and Babylonian ascendancy. Monogamy may not be a natural culture as juxtaposed with the nomadic bush man neanderthal commune but it is what we have now and we call it the monogamous family unit. This exists in the bush man experience when a woman allows one male commune member to copulate with her once a month with no thought of who is who as brother or cousin, never the father, son or uncle, but if she is with any man twice over two months, then they have to leave the commune and separate by going to the monogamous culture of formalities in a township. This is because she has been taken as a spouse, a wife just as Pharaoh acknowledged Sarai as Abraham's wife. They leave the bush. Click here.

Post a Comment