What you are perceiving and appreciating (apprehending) is the pendular, up and down emotion circling on white authority and there is no issue with presumptive white authority or social position with or without education but the coffee should be hot, the black rubber wheels pumped up and the galley full of food and the toast is not burned. There should be enough paper for the computer printer and enough basic income for the citizen so that the economy can function. None of the above is debatable and if in order, white is good in presumptive appointed authority; why not? The point of education is functionality; not assimilation when the dishwasher machine needs a consumer in Nevada...or in the Lakota nations or Missouri. Egypt is in Africa and its ancient civilization was certainly as black and multi-complexioned as the people in North Africa are today. Are they still compensating you for your White Amerindian Americano beauty with insufficient education? Juicy fruit is going to move you but At Western, articles by Sunkel and Wallerstein pointed out the structural nature of the world political system and also of the capitalist world economy. The political system may be based on tiers of influence and hegemony as we can see quite clearly yet as time moved on from our current juncture's valuation date of May 25th, 1977, now, it is evident that economic strength is influence, a strong population and it is also hegemony and systemic leadership. This is essentially agreement with other older economists who predated the founding of America but not China, Japan or Europe. As such, America is a student and May 25th 1977 was the opening day of Star Wars but also a test of North American understanding as set against a blockbuster 's back drop of evidence of the immediate present and the evolving future. Did you know this is being written by a Black dude from the Dee Lite/ Inner City/ Adeva generation who finished at Western with a B average ? The economy as Wallerstein points out may be a vacuum of rules involving the Smith/Keynes efficency with the central purpose being consumption in pure capitalism as a closed system;a simple system of buyers and sellers globally as one system offering goods at the lowest price yet as the established system it cannot entail a secondary system running counter to it that proffers as a socialist communist system the offering of allegiance to a belief in human equality and social programs that confirm this belief but with more expensive and some times inferior, wasteful manufactured goods. Both systems of influence , socialist communist and American capitalist, were dedicated officially to human equality as renditions of the one true global capitalist system (pure capitalism) and only one has had a Black leader or two while the system in America with Black leaders is insufficient as to ensuring the value of human life regardless of complexion. The two renditions competed around the world for influence and allegiance bit there is only one true global capitalist system. Comparatively speaking Socialist Communism was more akin to Pure capitalism in preserving and maintaining the consumer / citizen who was referred to the worker primarily. This pure capitalism, however, involves internal national efficiencies and global efficiencies. The global efficiencies demand the free movement of goods with the maintenance of home land security and national dignity; sovereignty also. The internal national efficiencies involve the most cheaply made goods and no waste of human life. But, what national dignity can you have if your people die off in the shift towards an automated robotic labor economy and away from the era of human muscle labor? As such, socialism was confused only on the point of the free movement of goods with a protectionism that blocked coca cola and Camel cigarettes as if they were propagandist while the Lada was the superior, more cheaply made automotive product with its technology being swarmed by Americans, Europeans and Asians in the guise of the Audi/Volkswagen. Socialist Communism was right as to the maintenance of the citizen /consumer/worker with what are now also UDHR policies so that the citizen as the key symbol of national dignity and as a consumer was enabled as a buyer and seller of machine made goods, made efficiently free of the cost of human labor in the purest form of aggressive capitalism. Capitalism in America,the American rendition (now in respite) suffered from an erroneous notion of aggressiveness and determined to argue that the citizen regardless of complexion is waste-able, disposable while the citizen is the most important engine or widget in domestic and international,truly aggressive, expansive and hegemonic growth capitalism. It is a false notion that American capitalism is aggressive yet fails to maintain the dignity and viability of the citizen. The strong, viable citizen is evidence of a strong and viable capitalism. The work of Marx, Lenin but also Mao Zedong in his book on Contradiction in the late 1930's is a perfect summation of what Contradiction you Apposite Amerindian late arrivals portend as Zedong confirms the understanding of Adam Smith, Keynes and the role of technology as affecting the role of human labor but not the value or the role of human life as set within the era of machine, robotic labor. Please see the following on Hilferding defining Finance Capital as seen in Wikipedia; Instead, finance capital sought a "centralized and privilege-dispensing state".[49] Hilferding saw this as part of the inevitable concentration of capital called for by Marxian economics, rather than a deviation from Market Capitalism. This is the evidence of modern, automated non human labor capitalism; a central privilege dispensing system that maintains the citizen and civility instead of tolerating any concept of an industrial waste land with wasted people and human life. As such the importance of maintaining the citizen in pure capitalism that is analogous to socialism is evident when people are the final end game to be won over as the domestic or international market you confused Anglo Latino people struggle to digest what you witness going on around that is really your emotional exam after all; all this time. Will it be the ramen, the sushi or the Ford truck on a Toyota platform or all three since we have basic income now and you feel good?

What you are perceiving and appreciating (apprehending) is the pendular, up and down emotion circling on white authority and there is no issue with presumptive white authority or social position with or without education but the coffee should be hot, the black rubber wheels pumped up and the galley full of food and the toast is not burned. There should be enough paper for the computer printer and enough basic income for the citizen so that the economy can function. None of the above is debatable and if in order, white is good in presumptive appointed authority; why not?    The point of education is functionality; not assimilation when the dishwasher machine needs a consumer in  Nevada...or in the Lakota nations or Missouri.   Egypt is in Africa and its ancient civilization was certainly as black and multi-complexioned  as the people in North Africa  are today.   Are they still compensating you for your White Amerindian Americano beauty with insufficient education?  Juicy fruit is going to move you  but At Western, articles by Sunkel and Wallerstein pointed out the structural nature of the world political system and also of the capitalist world economy.  The political system may be based on tiers of influence and hegemony as we can see quite clearly yet as time moved on from our current juncture's valuation date of May 25th, 1977, now, it is evident that economic strength is influence,  a strong population and it is also hegemony and systemic leadership. This is  essentially agreement  with other older economists who predated the founding of America but not China, Japan or Europe.  As such, America is a student and May 25th 1977 was the opening day of Star Wars but also a test of North American understanding as set against a blockbuster 's back drop of evidence of the immediate present and the evolving future. Did you know this is being written by a Black dude from the Dee Lite/ Inner City/ Adeva  generation who finished at Western with a B average ?  The economy as Wallerstein points out may be a vacuum of rules involving the  Smith/Keynes efficency with the central purpose being  consumption  in pure capitalism as a closed system;a simple  system of buyers and sellers globally as one system offering goods at the lowest price yet as the established system it cannot entail a secondary system running counter to it that proffers as a socialist communist system the  offering of  allegiance to a  belief in human equality  and social programs that confirm this belief but with  more expensive and some times inferior, wasteful  manufactured goods.  Both systems of influence , socialist communist  and American  capitalist,  were dedicated officially  to human equality as renditions of the one true global capitalist system (pure capitalism) and only one has had a Black leader or two while the system in America with Black leaders is insufficient  as to ensuring the value  of human life regardless of complexion. The two renditions competed around the world for influence and allegiance bit there is only one true global capitalist system.  Comparatively speaking Socialist Communism was more akin to Pure capitalism in preserving and maintaining the consumer / citizen who was referred to the worker primarily.  This pure capitalism, however,   involves internal national efficiencies and global efficiencies. The global efficiencies demand the free movement of goods with the maintenance of home land security and national dignity; sovereignty also. The internal national efficiencies involve the most cheaply made goods and no waste of human life.
But, what national dignity can you have if your people die off in the shift towards an  automated robotic labor economy and away from the era of human muscle labor? As such, socialism was confused only on the point of the free movement of goods with a protectionism that blocked coca cola and Camel cigarettes as if they were propagandist while the Lada was the superior, more cheaply made automotive  product with its technology being swarmed by Americans, Europeans and Asians  in the guise of the Audi/Volkswagen. Socialist Communism   was right as to the maintenance of the citizen /consumer/worker  with what are now also  UDHR policies so that the citizen as the key symbol of national dignity and as a  consumer was enabled as a buyer and seller of machine made goods, made efficiently  free of the cost of human labor in the purest form of aggressive capitalism.   Capitalism in America,the American rendition (now in respite)  suffered from an erroneous notion of aggressiveness and determined to argue that the citizen regardless of complexion  is waste-able, disposable while the citizen is the most important engine or widget in domestic and international,truly  aggressive, expansive and hegemonic growth  capitalism.    It is a false notion that American capitalism is aggressive yet
fails to maintain the dignity and viability of the citizen.  The strong,  viable citizen is evidence of a strong and viable capitalism.  The work of Marx, Lenin but also Mao Zedong in his book on  Contradiction in the late 1930's is a perfect summation of what Contradiction you Apposite Amerindian late arrivals portend as Zedong confirms  the understanding of Adam Smith, Keynes and  the role of technology as affecting the role of human labor but not the value or the role  of human life as set within the era of machine, robotic labor. Please see the following on Hilferding defining Finance Capital as seen in Wikipedia; Instead, finance capital sought a "centralized and privilege-dispensing state".^[49] Hilferding saw this as part of the inevitable concentration of capital called for by Marxian economics, rather than a deviation from 
Market Capitalism.  

 This is the evidence of modern, automated non human labor capitalism; a central privilege dispensing system that maintains the citizen and civility instead of tolerating any concept of an industrial waste land with wasted people and human life.  As such the importance of maintaining the citizen in pure capitalism that is analogous to socialism  is evident when people are the final end game to be won over as the domestic or international market you confused   Anglo Latino people struggle to digest what you witness going on around that is really your emotional exam  after all; all this time.   Will it be the ramen, the sushi or the Ford truck on a Toyota platform or all three since we have basic income now and you feel good?