European people don't want you to hurt people. You say you need to know if you are accepted and not rejected but how can you be accepted if you are hurting other people you call your competition in your harkening unto Europe for acknowledgement and to be seen? European people don't want you to hurt people. But you are part native Arawak and evidently part European or else your mind would not be turning to Europe. When Jesus said all the commandments are summed up in the command to love your neighbor as yourself, what does that mean to men who believe they should have a right to kill, steal and destroy and whose law and whose land is it when the neighbor is living on a subdivision that still is ancestral native land? There is a population that challenges, resists and resents the rules and attacks those involved in predicating the rules of peace as in the quiet laws of ownership of property and respect for human life. The territory is theirs. But, the law is from a received culture as emblemised in the US Constitution, the Magna Carta or the ten commandments. What if some of the people in this population are former Presidents, current U.S Presidents and future 3 time candidates? What if the evident social maladjustment of this population is manifested in the unpreparedness of a nation's democratically elected leader along with a racialised confirmation of their own sense of resentment and displacement vis a vis the written bodies of laws with a subtle but vicious complexionism featurism ( as in straighter hair but black or straighter nose but black) more so than the racialisation and this obfuscated by inclusive messages in the media that suggest the opposite yet there isn't one black school teacher in the entire country but there used to be millions of them before 9/11? What if for 3 and half years, the world witnesses nothing but a schooling of the elected leader and the abuse of the system by people who have always moved in the elected leader's slip stream. It is the Layer cake son. But, what if in 2001, someone says he will confirm again that he owns the territory and will ask what is the point of your laws if he can kill a soldier on the steps of a post office? Maybe you attack everybody in your Creole native community with any sense of officialdom or formality in education, destabilising them and sabotaging them to communicate your community's continued covert demand for compensation or maybe a treaty that other natives have while your Arawak community still has not received any such treaty. Maybe the end of this formal received Euro culture's officialdom on your land and your island is what you want so you can pick from any tree you see on what is now hotel property and take any villa, stand on any beach you see regardless of who owns it now since what is ownership? Isn't all the land to be owned in common? Who is the King if I can live in a home I do not own and put the owners under the floor? What is education if I can pretend to be the owner but I know I am not the owner? What is education when I can just pretend to be someone else with their ID or pretend to be a professional? What is a mortgage when your soul is not ready for that yet? Is your name Ray from the Ozark or Ray or Bubby Bare from Spanish Town? You look sort of Asian and you know how to challenge authority with a scallywag game, taking an American man's cigarette holder in his hotel room so he does not feel so authoritative when he comes to check his bank balance at the Bahamas branch. But the saboteur is a former employee of...a trainee of...but does not seem to believe he should have to respect ownership of property belonging to others. He might be the deputy chief of....and has a covert Arawak following with people who share his emotion regardless of complexion. Where did all of the West Indian graduates go; year after year, generation after generation? The graduate is a targeted symbol of that received culture but who put the demand on him to attend school except but that Arawak Native Black, Maroon, Asian looking, Hispanic or White looking native people and sometimes they have a Streatham accent? That relative sometimes follows the Creole Arawak mob in targeting his own graduate relative once the graduate status is achieved. But, isn't the graduate status family glory? You raised him or her. But, instead you resist, target and frustrate the graduate but he is your relative. People from Other communities that you envy watch and laugh as you hope to avoid culpability by emoting that you are just a child and how could you be guilty you say when the world took your Island in the Sun but your are guilty? You are a former chief of parking enforcement; a civil servant. Your intention is evident along with your compatriots. The greater community should react but when you have not reacted to defend your laws in his territory that is now really Crown governed, he says there is no Law so just go. He will stay and the received culture will go; n'est pas? When he kills a human being or his own son from his tribe or peoples on front of you and you don't react, he says what is the point of your laws? He has authority now? You should stop him to maintain your authority under your laws. But, human value and mutual safety also for the Creole is the point of the law. Many people who were victims of the original collision of cultures along with their descendants have digested law as theft since his territory was stolen under your laws. The questions have been asked before. We have the final answer as to all human value as the essence and purpose of the economy but this tension or the question has arisen before when much of human labor comes into immediate question technologically and full employment of the population is always the desired result vs. uncertainty and desperation but how is it that a population cannot just implement the basic income while instead it seems to challenge that solution in favour of full employment in a war on the brink of continued world civilization it self as seen in 1914 and 1939? Maybe you have been so abused by that received culture and civilization that it is hard to see you are worth it and not just refuse to be thrown away in the presence of your mechanised robotic machine labor as your replacement but your real purpose is the buying and the use of goods and products. E Pluribus Unum is the final answer. Basic income is the final answer but can imagery, if not alter policy and the evident final answer in Russia, Germany, America, Italy or Japan, can it impact negatively the minds and souls it seems only in America that are called upon to implement and give effect to policy thereby disabling the system and the people to benefit from the said non racialised policy in the false notion that you are approximating something Sophisticated, non former slave holding and non American? But, all societies had slaves for labor at some stage of their industrial development. The question is what hesitation is there? Presumedly, the logic of basic income is in the realm of European dna, African dna or Asian dna and it's genetic, historical memory. Basic income had its place in Egypt also after organised farming for the masses and the development of markets. The concept is predicated on the value of human life. Evidently, Natives do not resent the concept as an imposition from foreign powers. They have their own ten commandments that respect and value human life. But, there is a dna with an emotion that sometimes might be too well dressed these days and too skilled in a kitchen to be recognised in a discussion by anyone for it's continued emotional resistance of any rule of any kind; any rule or commandment since rules and commandments in themselves are foreign to this dna and also vehemently resented. This dna and it's resentment is not an issue when it is outside of the decision making process since the legislature was designed to maintain legislation based on the magna carta that values life. There is no argument there. As to the value of human life, the rules that uphold them, the decision making process and the final answer noted above, there is no argument or vehement resentment for what benefits us all. Policies that save life, build people and maintain life are the essence of our current and modern world economy that is nonetheless less dependent on people as industrial human labor whole remaining dependent on people as a commodity to fulfil consumption.

European people don't want you to hurt people.  You say you need to know if you are accepted and not rejected but how can you be accepted if you are hurting other people you call your competition in your harkening unto Europe for acknowledgement and to be seen?  European people don't want you to hurt people. But you are part native Arawak and evidently part European or else your mind would not be turning to Europe.  When Jesus said all the commandments are summed up in the command to love your neighbor as yourself, what does that mean to men who believe they should have a right to kill, steal and destroy and whose law and whose land is it when the neighbor is living on a subdivision that still is ancestral native land?  There is a population that challenges, resists and resents the rules and attacks those involved in predicating the rules of peace as in the quiet laws of ownership of property and respect for human life.   The territory is theirs. But, the law is from a received culture as emblemised in the US Constitution, the Magna Carta or the ten commandments. What if some of the people in this population are former Presidents, current U.S Presidents and future 3 time candidates?  What if the evident social maladjustment of this population is manifested in the unpreparedness of a nation's democratically elected leader along with a racialised confirmation of their own sense of resentment and displacement vis a vis the written bodies of laws with a subtle but vicious complexionism  featurism ( as in straighter hair but black or straighter nose but black) more so than the  racialisation and this obfuscated by inclusive messages in the media that suggest the opposite yet there isn't one black school teacher in the entire country but there used to be millions of them before 9/11?   What if for 3 and  half years, the world witnesses nothing but a schooling of the elected leader and the abuse of the system by people who have always moved in the elected leader's slip stream. It is the Layer cake son.     But, what if in 2001, someone says he will confirm again that he owns the territory and will ask what is the point of your laws if he can kill a soldier on the steps of a post office? Maybe you attack everybody in your Creole native  community with any sense of officialdom or formality in education, destabilising them  and sabotaging them to communicate your community's continued covert demand for compensation or maybe a treaty that other natives have while your Arawak community still has not received any such treaty.  Maybe the end of this formal  received Euro culture's officialdom on your land and your island is what you want so you can pick from any tree you see on what is now hotel property and take any villa, stand on any beach  you see regardless of who owns it now  since what is ownership? Isn't all the land to be owned in common? Who is the King if I can live in a home I do not own and put the owners under the floor?   What is education if I can pretend to be the owner but I know I am not the owner? What is education when I can just pretend to be someone else with their ID or pretend to be a professional? What is a mortgage when your soul is not ready for that yet? Is your name Ray from the Ozark or Ray or Bubby Bare from Spanish Town?  You look sort of Asian and you know how to challenge authority with a scallywag game, taking an American  man's cigarette holder in his hotel room  so he does not feel so authoritative when he comes to check his bank balance at the Bahamas branch.     But the saboteur is a former employee of...a trainee of...but does not seem to believe he should have to respect ownership of property belonging to others. He might be the deputy chief of....and has a covert Arawak  following with people who share his emotion regardless  of complexion.     Where did all of the West Indian graduates go; year after year, generation after generation?   The graduate is a targeted symbol of that received culture but who put the demand on him to attend school except but that Arawak Native Black, Maroon, Asian looking, Hispanic  or White looking native people and sometimes they have a Streatham accent?   That relative sometimes follows the Creole Arawak mob in targeting his own graduate relative once the graduate status is achieved.  But, isn't the graduate status family glory? You raised him or her.  But, instead you resist, target and frustrate the graduate but he is your relative. People from Other communities that you envy watch and laugh as you hope to avoid culpability by emoting that you are just a child and how could you be guilty you say when the world took your Island in the Sun but your are guilty?  You are a former chief of parking enforcement; a civil servant.  Your intention is evident along with your compatriots.  The greater community  should react but when you have not reacted to defend your laws in his territory that is now really Crown governed, he says there is no Law so just go.  He will stay and the received culture will go; n'est pas?  When he kills a human being or his own son from his tribe or peoples on front of you and you don't react, he says what is the point of your laws?   He has authority now?  You should stop him to maintain your authority under your laws.    But, human value and mutual safety also for the Creole is the point of the law.  Many people who were victims of the original collision of cultures along with their descendants have digested law as theft since his territory was stolen under your laws.    The questions have been asked before.  We have the final answer as to all  human value as the essence and purpose of the economy  but this tension or the question has arisen before when much of human labor comes into immediate question technologically  and full employment of the population is always the desired result vs. uncertainty and desperation but how is it that a population cannot just implement the basic income while instead it seems to challenge that solution in favour of full employment in a war on the brink of continued world  civilization it self as seen in 1914 and 1939? Maybe you have been so abused by that received culture and civilization that it is hard to see you are worth it and not just refuse to be thrown away in the presence of your mechanised robotic machine labor as your replacement but your real purpose is the buying and the use of goods and products.    E Pluribus Unum is the final answer.  Basic income is the final answer but can imagery,  if not alter policy and the evident final answer in Russia, Germany, America, Italy or Japan,  can it   impact negatively the minds and souls it seems only in America that are called upon to implement and give effect to policy thereby disabling the system and the people to benefit from the said non racialised policy in the false notion that you are approximating something Sophisticated, non former slave  holding and non American?  But, all societies had slaves for labor at some stage of their industrial development. The question is what hesitation is there? Presumedly, the logic of basic income is in the realm of European dna, African dna  or Asian dna and it's genetic, historical  memory. Basic income had its place in Egypt also after organised farming for the masses and the development of markets.   The concept is predicated on the value of human life.  Evidently, Natives do not resent the concept as an imposition from foreign powers. They have their own ten commandments that respect and value human life. But, there is a dna with an emotion that sometimes might be too well dressed these days and too skilled in a kitchen to be recognised in a discussion by anyone for it's continued emotional resistance of any rule of any kind; any rule or commandment since rules and commandments in themselves are foreign to this dna and also vehemently resented. This dna and it's resentment is not an issue when it is outside of the decision  making process since the legislature was designed to maintain legislation based on the magna carta that values life. There is no argument there. As to the value of human life, the rules that uphold them, the decision making process and the final answer noted above, there is no argument or vehement resentment for what benefits us all.  Policies that save life, build people and maintain life are the essence of our current and  modern  world economy that is nonetheless less dependent on people as industrial human  labor whole remaining dependent on people as a commodity to fulfil consumption.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

The man who was a pirate ship captain had children with a woman who was the daughter of Cabot; Cabot being an orphan like the pirate ship captain. The boy grew up and demanded that people listen to him when he spoke and he had a commanding voice except because of the Cabot dna, the only place he seems to have wanted to go was back to France to ask if he was accepted. Words like appreciation, honor, award, inheritance etc...greeting card words would drive him to jealousy and emotions that centred on competition. He bought a house quite young and should have planned to give it to his children as testator but seems to have worked it out that he would rather abandon the home and allow others to take it or squat in the home. When his children bought homes, he seems to have wanted to live in it with them only to have an authority game with them or power game as to ask if they would ever try to command him to come or go etc and to also place himself in a position to hope to inherit from them but not with any discussion. His wife was a court jester who sought attention and spent a lot of her energy in 'make believe' again in society like in the court with queen watching but not for work that honors but for rude, jester behaviours that mock and tempt authority. The man who chose to seek to inherit from his children vs. being the testator was unable to help himself it seems in seeking acceptance as if Cabot's dna took exploring North America's waste land regions as eternal damnation so far away from the pastry shops of Paris or Toulousse and while he was part ship captain, he was also that jester and that Cabot desperately seeking acceptance so that almost anyone could interrupt his boundaries of self respect and tell him what to do. It was quite unusual to see a man who raised 9 BLACK children and demanded that school teachers respect his wishes for their placement in the advanced class, some how turn around and help the people who were in the bottom of the school system and who were jealous of his Black children's work as graduate professionals since any band wagon or mob emotion for acceptance is what he would follow as part of Cabot's dna and the jester also was essentially indentured servant dna who believed they were owed something ancestrally as entitled to them biblically and they seem to have decided to hold officialdom ransom was the pirate's dna would understand how to do it until the debt is paid to the death. See Exodus 15 it seems. Yet the people demanding that he ignore his boundaries of self respect were younger than him and anxious about social authority and acceptance but in the end, so was he as a father as he also had no formal education or if he did, he considered his children's education as more than what he got, many years more than what he got simply because he refused to go after 9 years old and this education was a threat to his pea brain 9 year old emotions as contained in a 5'10 80 year old body and the people begging him to hurt his children were much younger and all they did is laugh at him when he made a deal to sell his son's stuff to people who are probably dead and only emoting this concept from a building where they were imprisoned for life for stealing the possessions of other graduates who athletes of the year and university graduates; imprisoned for life as it is the penalty for mischief involving property; any property that might be intellectual property or business property that some may say they reserve the right without law to hold indefinitely. The real issue is the Court Jester's dna mocks authority and is rewarded some how and what if the mayor's dna is also court jester dna? His wife was part court jester and also Cabot where it mocked authority, resented anything called society but also wanted to hurt people who had any formal education since Cabot's dna seems to have said it had a right to inherit once as officialdom never gave him anything. Her real issue in seeking to be accepted once with the same Cabot dna as his was a resentment for complexions lighter than hers and her resentment was murderous; like a kamikaze hoping to kill any children or families that were targets for their complexion primarily but she would use any weakness or resentment to work division among that family to see her darker children inherit from her husband's lighter children while her children had the same opportunities to go to school as her husband's arguably lighter children but they were not as...beautiful but they also did not have her children's under cultural expectation of entitlement; an under culture of some kind in the West Indies and in spite of this under culture no one has to die or be targeted. She read only one book entitled ''Games My Mother Never Taught Me' and her darker people from Goat Island on the periphery of our world civilization wanted to see if she could make him do anything as triumph for darker people who see the world as favoring lighter skin and they imagine that the degrees suggesting inheritance or systemic acceptance are handed out to these arguably lighter people but everybody can see her husband's children were black; not light or straight nosed yet the Goat island people( some looking Asian with patois accents and resenting the father's ability to intimidate) wanted to see if they could turn the father who extolled education into an idiot..make him move like an idiot, like a robot and do anything like abandon two condos in a 'you are MI6 now' game so she drugged him and the lighter children and tried to use any weakness of character or sin or question about propriety she had against him, accusing him like '..Is it appropriate for you to be in a condo alone with my daughter and sit on a couch with her?' although he was so handsome and certain that he should be; be the leader of any situation or at least get the acceptance and authority for any 2 for 1 condo deal his son might have suggested they invest in. that while the son found the tenants, the father wanted to have the honor...steal the honor of his essays and law firm file work also with idiots who wanted to steal honor much like the father. Jeroboam stole a scepter once in his own expectation that he should be the king as a taller competitor for the throne already in Rehoboam's possession under a united Israel as son of Solomon but Jeroboam was a son of Mephibosheth who was the grandson of Saul and the son of Michal who seems to have been Ramesses dna. The only issue with all of this is not only the presumption to be the holder of an honor in other people's work as in stolen honor in the work the Lord's son has finished in faith but a continued drive right back to naught to ask who is the king and what is ownership if I want to just rip your ass? Michal was a sex operation and maybe she ripped some asses to finally understand what she is but unfortunately, with education it would have been obvious if she did not bleed at 12 every month. So, Jeroboam built buildings in a stolen, divided kingdom. This father only wants to say there should be no law; no civilization for his happiness in his kingdom and would want a a war to see the world end where he can be the leader or the general in a world that he wants; without rules of any kind and he will have the honor since in Jeroboam's world, although under a stolen throne, his honor would be to pass his buildings to his son. He would not steal from his son but would work with him for many generations. That is his glory although singed with some shame in the divisiveness and the theft. This man's glory would have to be shame in every rendition of human civilization but might have glory no where else but in a cave where the power of one neanderthal resists the power of another. If he was pure Cabot dna, then he might see the honor of being a testator like Jeroboam but the Pirate's dna, possibly Blackbeard, was part Dutch or Scottish cave dwelling neanderthal and he would hide the stolen loot quite often in a cave near Frenchman's Cove. Google Frenchman's Cove and understand the Pirates (plural) of the Caribbean. The father's deeper orphan minded, French indentured servant emotions and pirate determination that only sees human life as a casualty or collateral damage with his neanderthal underpinning and theories of emotional success in his paradigm or out look determined his practice. His glory is his shame; stolen honor, stolen degree statements, plagiarised essays and the effort to be his own son's heir of his son's little pattie shop, mechanic's shop or law firm in the year 2011. The father's glory is the father's shame. The son is always honored because he honored the father that fed him, clothed him in a four bed house in Westchester or a similar neighborhood and demanded that he do his school work and go to school. It looks like your son won the Caribana motion to honor you since the father is watching and helped Fukyerselfwenuhurtuson(that is all Farquerson is asking you to do when he sees what beach comber you are...and if you do it, then he is your master but I thought you were the chief of postal officers?) and now you want to steal the honor, the work and read the files in the Cave at Frenchman's Cove like your most primordial ancestry is willing you to do but you should have had enough authority to ask to be a duty counsel or Crown disclosure officer where you would read the allegations and then see the trial result on that file you thought was impossible but it was just really an exam question. Why don't you audit some Law School courses for free since it is permitted. You are also certainly welcome as a pensioner with Crown pension. Now, you see!

Post a Comment