What will you do if they depict Buddha as white; Jesus!! The final answer in our world is an airline passenger information and passport verification terminal as depicted in the movie Fargo; not Aboriginal (regardless of complexion) covert resistance in our established system of laws to protect them and all of us. What will do if they depict Buddha as white; Jesus!! Anybody can graduate and school is an enriching experience to enable us to be conversant and capable when the questions as to the final answer is put before us in the Court. The final answer is not changing. Click here for more. St. Magnus, The Martyr, solved a problem in Court several times under the hallowed principles of the Magna Carta that establishes that the allegation must be knowable and corroborated with verifiable evidence above and beyond the oral testimony of witnesses that could be believed above the testimony of the accused or possibly disbelieved but if there is nothing else, there is really nothing for the Court to go on and that golden thread was certainly enshrined in St. Magnus' jurisprudence. It is as follows: there is a duty upon the prosecution to prove the matter beyond a reasonable doubt and the oral testimony of witnesses alone will not satisfy the proof to fulfill the duty. This took place in the middle ages in the year 1116 actually before the Magna Carta was signed and was written based on the Roman legal principles of Cicero and the real reason is to avoid the incidence of wrongful accusation and arbitrary detention and this would be the case in any civilised part of the world that is not beset by fascist power hungry malicious dictators or Warlords who just arrest people who teach God's name as the ''I Am'' where God says ''I am that I am'' and understanding this is the clearing away of all of the names and titles that beset us and is in essence religion itself or, better yet, it is worship since like most things, friend, I am nothing and then the Lord says pick up your cross and deny yourself and follow me. This need for proof as to the guilty mind and also of a foul act of deliberate or reckless behavior is the essence of our criminal law and this is what they teach you in law school with various codified situations that old men have meditated upon for a very long time to work out a balance and a fulcrum that keeps McDonalds safe any where in the world along with the 7 Star Hotel and your luggage on your flight back home to paradise. It keeps you safe as well since you must have a receipt for the coffee, muffin and the Big Mac. Three years of meditation on these issues turns the study into music with principles turned into chords and crescendos when a situation sounds like a Contract dispute and another situation sounds like a Tort case and another situation sounds like something falling somewhere in between Contract and Trust law such as the Quistclose Trust and I will sit at the back as Co litigator, you will be the Lead Litigator and the file will cost only a ''smalls'' for now with the work being done by who does the work at the back and there is no need for me to come to Court unless somebody can't read the typing and why would that happen? But, it has to be done by a willing human being since, the first rule of the pirate is ransom and that is also understood as the Error and omissions obligation. There has to be something that will promote the fear of death and life in the heart of the potentially helpful law graduate who could lie to you and get away with it if you don't know the difference. Machines are machines but a human being in a machine is a creative being and could creatively decide not to answer at all and why should he when he is nothing to lose or gain by helping you but I suppose you think he would help for the honor. What honor is there if you killed him? Why would anyone tell you the truth if you already took his freedom to live and to enjoy life? Why would he tell you the truth? Maybe you can find a willing Yale graduate who is 170 years old who wants to be a machine but for $60,000.00 per year as a private stipend or retainer, I am sure the graduate will read through the muck and maybe even help police authorities develop air tight cases so people can't just walk due to rights violations. With the $60,000.00 he or she will buy a Kia or a tiny GM Vehicle and get on with life. Hear the Lead when he reads the solution in Court as typed by the file processor since somebody has to go through the muck to find the Golden thread and we do the work. Please see following: Sankey's judgment in Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462 is famous for iterating the duty inherent on the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In pertinent part, his judgment stated: Throughout the web of the English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen – that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt subject to what I have already said as to the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception... This judgment is usually referred to as the "golden thread". These principles find their origin in our ancient law as the stems of the ten commandments in various re applications of those foundational principles since my house is your house if you come as a guest but you can't just kill, steal and destroy or else we will be at war and your crops and livestock are yours and they are capable of suffering theft and if so, it is an offense that we mutually and collectively disdain so that we might have peace and it is not a question that is being imposed on us from a far away land. It is your own native law and this is what you must see. The language is the issue but the raw principle is yours and you should not exclude yourself but invite yourself when some part of your dna must or maybe it could find some root in the history and in the people that wrote these principles down even if it is only the Roman or the African Roman or the African since Jacob's Indigenous, Nomadic Israel received a culture from Egypt rather evidently. The question is why would you think that you could be in that particular home ? Why do you think that you only have to show more force or willingness to occupy it or more association to what bum since you already had a court date and convicted for Theft over but you went back to the same address with the intention to what next; kill the owner? Now, with every legal matter there will be a final answer and that answer can be known and understood before you get into the court since you can't say ''...I just thought that it would be...and that I believe that you could because of tv.'' What cases are relevant? What principles are relevant since is it not written? Now, the indigenous population in North America owns trillions of dollars of property and so do the West Indians. This is protected by law. The English legal principles constitute the laws that protect these lands in both the foundational English principles and the re application in the immediate jurisdiction. The resentment, the resistance and the lack of reception to the system of laws is endemic simply because there is an ancestral hurt or preemption of a sense of personal and cultural suffocation that brings a knee jerk sense of revolt to that ''foreign'' and ''far away'' authority telling you how to live your life on Cosmic Beach in Negril or in Hopetario since it feels like an imposition although McDonalds could not exist without these laws and the intention of these laws crafted in the realm of St. Magnus in 1116 is to protect you in and outside of your home always and also to protect your luggage to and from that island paradise where you buy Nikes, Audis and Coca Cola quite a lot these days and you want to be able to enjoy this safety and quiet so how do we sit down and learn these laws while not suffocating in a sense of cultural extermination as we read about Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball or as we read Chapelton and Berry? We need to see what besets us and it is to find our story in the story and your mind is telling you that you are not Black Irish while there are many Black people born in Ireland who were exported to the West Indies before and after slavery and many West Indians at some stage have returned to Ireland, Scotland and the UK with a continual interchange and intermingling of the population. But, you could be a West Indian with a dna that needs an acknowledgement of its foundational root before it will function in the world; an acknowledgement or else settling down to learn anything in a structured environment if it is not the ancestral environment is difficult and you could be that Japanese dna from a the year 1600 when an expeditionary force settled in Jamaica before the English came in greater numbers. If you are that dna, it may help if you imagine yourself learning for Japan and that the school your are sitting in is an English School in Japan and that as the English are in Japan, the Japanese can learn about the English in England or in other Anglo territories since we share foods, sports and global technological culture. Japanese headship is what you are looking to acknowledge in yourself. It is ancestral. Once you do, purpose in learning and ancestral honoring ignites. There is no question about ability and the real difference between a Grade 1 student who succeeds and the grade 1 student who is held back is submission. When you turn 18 years old, your need for submission to succeed in structured school environments does not change when, in spite of your West Indian girth and machismo , who is teaching whom... for the exams at least? There is much to understand and what drug says you will rely on the all other world populations to ensure there is sufficient product safety as required by legislation and as defended in Tort law principles seen in the seminal case of Donoghue and Stevenson? You need to understand these principles. You need to understand something before you open your mouth and give advice since negligent advice is a litigious issue with tortious liability. See the case of Junior Books vs. Vetchi and Hedley Byrne vs. Heller since these laws govern that beautiful airport in Kingston Jamaica and that beautiful hotel...all the beautiful hotels and the food also. There is no need for a facade of unqualified and inexperienced people in the legal system who are exterminated by a guttural emotion of resistance and resentment against a foreign rulership that you would wish would just leave you alone so that you could just not only self govern but feel your self governorship and what is the law governing the airport in Africa or in Japan? What is the law governing the safety of property and person. See R v. Palmer for more. The issue is that for many years, the population has unwittingly killed many lawyers who were qualified and they even tried to turn Marcus Garvey into a machine as he finished at Oxford with a ''Second Class'' degree classification which is quite good. But, he faked his death with the help of an older West Indian who was 170 years old from the Bahamas where they blew up a boat and then Marcus took on a new identity and built the Court house you see today in Downtown Kingston. So, you would lose ten lawyers and end up with one facade or a few facades who are financed and big and this may not be a bad idea since it can work for the community to ensure the skilled workers are financed who outsource to the facade and the sums are reasonable since somebody has to do the work and your cologne is of no relevance to the Judge and nor is your girth really but you thought that is what is happening in Manhattan and Toronto so you got a penis extension but the only thing that matters is the list of cases that demonstrate there is no evidence to satisfy the Crown's onus or if there is some evidence, what credible defense can your client be afforded on this fact scenario? Why did he pick up a large cooking knife at the back of the restaurant and walk with it in the alley toward some onlookers who worked in the Kebab shop down the way? Why was he in the alley when the police were called about a man in an alley with a large cooking knife? Maybe he is just a cook at the Jamaican takeout or a Neighborhood watch officer and the knife was old and ready for disposal. So, do sit down Mr.....? What did you say your name is? We are soo pleased you could join us. Pop the champagne and then we eat!!

 What will you do if they depict Buddha as white; Jesus!! The final answer in our world is an airline passenger information and passport verification terminal as depicted in the movie Fargo; not Aboriginal (regardless of complexion) covert resistance in our established system of laws to protect them and all of us. What will do if they depict Buddha as white; Jesus!!   Anybody can graduate and school is an enriching experience to enable us to be conversant and capable when the questions as to the final answer is put before us in the Court.  The final answer is not changing.   Click here for more.    St. Magnus,  The Martyr, solved a problem in Court several times under the hallowed principles of the Magna Carta that establishes that the allegation must be knowable and corroborated with verifiable evidence above and beyond the oral testimony of witnesses that could be believed above the testimony of the accused or possibly disbelieved but if there is nothing else, there is really nothing for the Court to go on and that golden thread was certainly enshrined in St. Magnus' jurisprudence. It is  as follows:  there is a duty  upon the prosecution to prove the matter beyond a reasonable doubt and the oral testimony of witnesses alone will not satisfy the proof to fulfill the duty.    This took place in the middle ages in the year 1116 actually before the Magna Carta was signed and was written based on the Roman legal principles of Cicero and the real reason is to avoid the incidence of wrongful accusation and arbitrary detention and this would be  the case in any civilised part of the world that is not beset by fascist power hungry malicious dictators or Warlords who just arrest people who  teach God's name as the ''I Am'' where God says ''I am that I am'' and  understanding this  is the clearing away of all of the names and titles that beset us and  is in essence  religion itself or, better yet,  it is worship since like most things, friend, I am nothing and then the Lord says pick up your cross and deny yourself and follow me. This need for proof as to the guilty mind and also of a foul act of deliberate or reckless behavior  is the essence of our criminal law and this is what they teach you in law school with various codified situations that old men have meditated upon for a very long time to work out a balance and a fulcrum that keeps McDonalds safe any where in the world along with the 7 Star Hotel and your luggage on your flight back home to paradise.  It keeps you safe as well since you must have a receipt for the coffee, muffin and the Big Mac.     Three years of meditation on these issues turns the study into music with principles turned into chords and crescendos when a situation sounds like a Contract dispute and another situation sounds like a Tort case and another situation sounds like something falling somewhere in between Contract and Trust law such as the Quistclose Trust  and I will sit at the back as Co litigator, you will be the Lead Litigator  and the file will cost only a ''smalls'' for now with the work being done by who does the work at the back and there is no need for me to come to Court unless somebody can't read the typing and why would that happen?  But, it has to be done by a willing human being since, the first rule of the pirate is ransom and that is also understood as the  Error and omissions  obligation.  There has to be something that will promote the fear of death and life in the heart of the potentially helpful law graduate who could lie to you and get away with it if you don't know the difference. Machines are machines but a human being in a machine is a creative being and could creatively decide not to answer at all and why should he when he is nothing to lose or gain by helping you but I suppose you think he would help for the honor. What honor is there if you killed him?    Why would anyone tell you the truth if you already took his freedom to live and to enjoy life?  Why would he tell you the truth? Maybe you can find a willing Yale graduate who is 170 years old who wants to be a machine but for $60,000.00 per year as a  private stipend or retainer,  I am sure the graduate will read through the muck and maybe even help police authorities develop air tight cases so people can't just walk due to rights violations.  With the $60,000.00 he or she will buy a Kia or a tiny GM Vehicle and get on with life.       Hear the Lead when he reads the solution in Court as typed by the file processor since somebody has to go through the muck to find the Golden thread and we do the work.  Please see following:     Sankey's judgment in Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462 is famous for iterating the duty inherent on the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In pertinent part, his judgment stated:  Throughout the web of the English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen – that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt subject to what I have already said as to the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception...  This judgment is usually referred to as the "golden thread".    These principles find their origin in our ancient law as the stems of the ten commandments in various re applications of those foundational principles since my house is your house if you come as a guest but you can't just kill, steal and destroy or else we will be at war and your crops and livestock are yours and they are capable of suffering theft and if so, it is an offense that we mutually and collectively disdain so that we might have peace and it is not a question that is being imposed on us from a far away land. It is your own native law and this is what you must see. The language is the issue but the raw principle is yours and you should not exclude yourself but invite yourself when some part of your dna must or maybe it could find some root in the history and  in the people that wrote these principles down even if it is only the Roman or the African Roman or the African since Jacob's Indigenous, Nomadic Israel received a culture from Egypt rather evidently.  The question is why would you think that you could be in that particular  home ?    Why do you think that you only have to show more force or willingness to occupy it or more association to what bum since you already had a court date and convicted for Theft over but you went back to the same address with the intention to what next; kill the owner?    Now, with every legal matter there will be a final answer and that answer can be known and understood before you get into the court since you can't say ''...I just thought that it would be...and that I believe that you could because of tv.''   What cases are relevant? What principles are relevant since  is it not written?        Now, the indigenous population in North America owns trillions of dollars of property and so do the West Indians.   This is protected by law.   The English legal principles constitute the laws that protect these lands in both the foundational English principles and the re application in the immediate jurisdiction. The resentment, the resistance and the lack of reception to the system of laws is endemic simply because there is an ancestral hurt or preemption of a sense of personal and cultural suffocation  that brings a knee jerk sense of revolt to that ''foreign'' and ''far away'' authority telling you how to live your life on Cosmic Beach in Negril or in Hopetario since it feels like an imposition although McDonalds could not exist without these laws and the intention of these laws crafted in the realm of St. Magnus in 1116  is to protect you in and outside of your home always and also to protect your luggage to and from that island paradise where you buy Nikes, Audis and Coca Cola quite a lot these days and you want to be able to enjoy this safety and quiet so how do we sit down and learn these laws while not suffocating in a sense of cultural extermination as we read about Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball or as we read Chapelton and Berry? We need to see what besets us and it is to find our story in the story and your mind is telling you that you are not Black Irish while there are many Black people born in Ireland who were exported to the West Indies before and after slavery and many West Indians at some stage have returned to Ireland, Scotland and the UK with a continual interchange and intermingling of the population.   But, you could be a West Indian with a dna that needs an acknowledgement of its foundational root before it will function in the world; an acknowledgement or else settling down to learn anything in a structured environment if it is not the ancestral environment is difficult and you could be that Japanese dna from a the year 1600 when an expeditionary force settled in Jamaica before the English came in greater numbers.  If you are that dna, it may help if you imagine yourself learning for Japan and that the school your are sitting in is an English School in Japan and that as the English are in Japan, the Japanese can learn about the English in England or in other Anglo territories since we share foods, sports and global technological culture. Japanese headship is what you are looking to acknowledge in yourself. It is ancestral. Once you do, purpose in learning and ancestral honoring ignites. There is no question about ability and the real difference between a Grade 1 student who succeeds and the grade 1 student who is held back is submission.  When you turn 18 years old, your need for submission to succeed in structured school environments does not change when, in spite of your West Indian girth and machismo , who is teaching whom... for the exams at least?  There is much to understand and what drug says you will rely on the all other world populations to ensure there is sufficient product safety as required by legislation and as defended in Tort law principles seen in the seminal case of Donoghue and Stevenson?  You need to understand these principles. You need to understand something before you open your mouth and give advice  since negligent advice is a litigious issue with tortious liability. See the case of Junior Books vs. Vetchi and Hedley Byrne vs. Heller since these laws govern that beautiful airport in Kingston Jamaica and that beautiful hotel...all the beautiful hotels and the food also.     There is no need for a facade of unqualified and inexperienced people in the legal system who are exterminated by a guttural emotion of resistance and resentment against a foreign rulership that you would wish would just leave you alone so that you could just not only self govern but feel your self governorship and what is the law governing the airport in Africa or in Japan? What is the law governing the safety of property and person. See R v. Palmer for more. The issue is that for many years, the population has unwittingly killed many lawyers who were qualified and they even tried to turn Marcus Garvey into a machine as he finished at Oxford with a ''Second Class'' degree classification which is quite good. But, he faked his death with the help of an older West Indian who was 170 years old from the Bahamas where they blew up a boat and then Marcus took on a new identity and built the Court house you see today in Downtown Kingston.  So, you would lose ten lawyers and end up with one facade or a few facades who are financed and big and this may not be a bad idea since it can work for the community to ensure the skilled workers  are financed who outsource to the facade  and the sums are reasonable since somebody has to do the work and your cologne is of no relevance to the Judge and nor is your girth really but you thought that is what is happening in Manhattan and Toronto so you got a penis extension but the only thing that matters is the list of cases that demonstrate there is no evidence to satisfy the Crown's onus or if there is some evidence, what credible defense can your client be afforded on this fact scenario? Why did he pick up a large cooking knife at the back of the restaurant and walk with it in the alley toward some onlookers who worked in the Kebab shop down the way? Why was he in the alley when the police were called about a man in an alley with a large cooking knife?  Maybe he is just a cook at the Jamaican takeout or  a Neighborhood watch officer  and the knife was old and ready for disposal.      So, do sit down Mr.....? What did you say your name is? We are soo pleased you could join us. Pop the champagne and then we eat!! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

The man who was a pirate ship captain had children with a woman who was the daughter of Cabot; Cabot being an orphan like the pirate ship captain. The boy grew up and demanded that people listen to him when he spoke and he had a commanding voice except because of the Cabot dna, the only place he seems to have wanted to go was back to France to ask if he was accepted. Words like appreciation, honor, award, inheritance etc...greeting card words would drive him to jealousy and emotions that centred on competition. He bought a house quite young and should have planned to give it to his children as testator but seems to have worked it out that he would rather abandon the home and allow others to take it or squat in the home. When his children bought homes, he seems to have wanted to live in it with them only to have an authority game with them or power game as to ask if they would ever try to command him to come or go etc and to also place himself in a position to hope to inherit from them but not with any discussion. His wife was a court jester who sought attention and spent a lot of her energy in 'make believe' again in society like in the court with queen watching but not for work that honors but for rude, jester behaviours that mock and tempt authority. The man who chose to seek to inherit from his children vs. being the testator was unable to help himself it seems in seeking acceptance as if Cabot's dna took exploring North America's waste land regions as eternal damnation so far away from the pastry shops of Paris or Toulousse and while he was part ship captain, he was also that jester and that Cabot desperately seeking acceptance so that almost anyone could interrupt his boundaries of self respect and tell him what to do. It was quite unusual to see a man who raised 9 BLACK children and demanded that school teachers respect his wishes for their placement in the advanced class, some how turn around and help the people who were in the bottom of the school system and who were jealous of his Black children's work as graduate professionals since any band wagon or mob emotion for acceptance is what he would follow as part of Cabot's dna and the jester also was essentially indentured servant dna who believed they were owed something ancestrally as entitled to them biblically and they seem to have decided to hold officialdom ransom was the pirate's dna would understand how to do it until the debt is paid to the death. See Exodus 15 it seems. Yet the people demanding that he ignore his boundaries of self respect were younger than him and anxious about social authority and acceptance but in the end, so was he as a father as he also had no formal education or if he did, he considered his children's education as more than what he got, many years more than what he got simply because he refused to go after 9 years old and this education was a threat to his pea brain 9 year old emotions as contained in a 5'10 80 year old body and the people begging him to hurt his children were much younger and all they did is laugh at him when he made a deal to sell his son's stuff to people who are probably dead and only emoting this concept from a building where they were imprisoned for life for stealing the possessions of other graduates who athletes of the year and university graduates; imprisoned for life as it is the penalty for mischief involving property; any property that might be intellectual property or business property that some may say they reserve the right without law to hold indefinitely. The real issue is the Court Jester's dna mocks authority and is rewarded some how and what if the mayor's dna is also court jester dna? His wife was part court jester and also Cabot where it mocked authority, resented anything called society but also wanted to hurt people who had any formal education since Cabot's dna seems to have said it had a right to inherit once as officialdom never gave him anything. Her real issue in seeking to be accepted once with the same Cabot dna as his was a resentment for complexions lighter than hers and her resentment was murderous; like a kamikaze hoping to kill any children or families that were targets for their complexion primarily but she would use any weakness or resentment to work division among that family to see her darker children inherit from her husband's lighter children while her children had the same opportunities to go to school as her husband's arguably lighter children but they were not as...beautiful but they also did not have her children's under cultural expectation of entitlement; an under culture of some kind in the West Indies and in spite of this under culture no one has to die or be targeted. She read only one book entitled ''Games My Mother Never Taught Me' and her darker people from Goat Island on the periphery of our world civilization wanted to see if she could make him do anything as triumph for darker people who see the world as favoring lighter skin and they imagine that the degrees suggesting inheritance or systemic acceptance are handed out to these arguably lighter people but everybody can see her husband's children were black; not light or straight nosed yet the Goat island people( some looking Asian with patois accents and resenting the father's ability to intimidate) wanted to see if they could turn the father who extolled education into an idiot..make him move like an idiot, like a robot and do anything like abandon two condos in a 'you are MI6 now' game so she drugged him and the lighter children and tried to use any weakness of character or sin or question about propriety she had against him, accusing him like '..Is it appropriate for you to be in a condo alone with my daughter and sit on a couch with her?' although he was so handsome and certain that he should be; be the leader of any situation or at least get the acceptance and authority for any 2 for 1 condo deal his son might have suggested they invest in. that while the son found the tenants, the father wanted to have the honor...steal the honor of his essays and law firm file work also with idiots who wanted to steal honor much like the father. Jeroboam stole a scepter once in his own expectation that he should be the king as a taller competitor for the throne already in Rehoboam's possession under a united Israel as son of Solomon but Jeroboam was a son of Mephibosheth who was the grandson of Saul and the son of Michal who seems to have been Ramesses dna. The only issue with all of this is not only the presumption to be the holder of an honor in other people's work as in stolen honor in the work the Lord's son has finished in faith but a continued drive right back to naught to ask who is the king and what is ownership if I want to just rip your ass? Michal was a sex operation and maybe she ripped some asses to finally understand what she is but unfortunately, with education it would have been obvious if she did not bleed at 12 every month. So, Jeroboam built buildings in a stolen, divided kingdom. This father only wants to say there should be no law; no civilization for his happiness in his kingdom and would want a a war to see the world end where he can be the leader or the general in a world that he wants; without rules of any kind and he will have the honor since in Jeroboam's world, although under a stolen throne, his honor would be to pass his buildings to his son. He would not steal from his son but would work with him for many generations. That is his glory although singed with some shame in the divisiveness and the theft. This man's glory would have to be shame in every rendition of human civilization but might have glory no where else but in a cave where the power of one neanderthal resists the power of another. If he was pure Cabot dna, then he might see the honor of being a testator like Jeroboam but the Pirate's dna, possibly Blackbeard, was part Dutch or Scottish cave dwelling neanderthal and he would hide the stolen loot quite often in a cave near Frenchman's Cove. Google Frenchman's Cove and understand the Pirates (plural) of the Caribbean. The father's deeper orphan minded, French indentured servant emotions and pirate determination that only sees human life as a casualty or collateral damage with his neanderthal underpinning and theories of emotional success in his paradigm or out look determined his practice. His glory is his shame; stolen honor, stolen degree statements, plagiarised essays and the effort to be his own son's heir of his son's little pattie shop, mechanic's shop or law firm in the year 2011. The father's glory is the father's shame. The son is always honored because he honored the father that fed him, clothed him in a four bed house in Westchester or a similar neighborhood and demanded that he do his school work and go to school. It looks like your son won the Caribana motion to honor you since the father is watching and helped Fukyerselfwenuhurtuson(that is all Farquerson is asking you to do when he sees what beach comber you are...and if you do it, then he is your master but I thought you were the chief of postal officers?) and now you want to steal the honor, the work and read the files in the Cave at Frenchman's Cove like your most primordial ancestry is willing you to do but you should have had enough authority to ask to be a duty counsel or Crown disclosure officer where you would read the allegations and then see the trial result on that file you thought was impossible but it was just really an exam question. Why don't you audit some Law School courses for free since it is permitted. You are also certainly welcome as a pensioner with Crown pension. Now, you see!

Post a Comment