Posts

Showing posts from November, 2018
Show all
Image

The Sunday Mass - 1st Sunday of Advent - December 2, 2018

Post a Comment

What will you do if they depict Buddha as white; Jesus!! The final answer in our world is an airline passenger information and passport verification terminal as depicted in the movie Fargo; not Aboriginal (regardless of complexion) covert resistance in our established system of laws to protect them and all of us. What will do if they depict Buddha as white; Jesus!! Anybody can graduate and school is an enriching experience to enable us to be conversant and capable when the questions as to the final answer is put before us in the Court. The final answer is not changing. Click here for more. St. Magnus, The Martyr, solved a problem in Court several times under the hallowed principles of the Magna Carta that establishes that the allegation must be knowable and corroborated with verifiable evidence above and beyond the oral testimony of witnesses that could be believed above the testimony of the accused or possibly disbelieved but if there is nothing else, there is really nothing for the Court to go on and that golden thread was certainly enshrined in St. Magnus' jurisprudence. It is as follows: there is a duty upon the prosecution to prove the matter beyond a reasonable doubt and the oral testimony of witnesses alone will not satisfy the proof to fulfill the duty. This took place in the middle ages in the year 1116 actually before the Magna Carta was signed and was written based on the Roman legal principles of Cicero and the real reason is to avoid the incidence of wrongful accusation and arbitrary detention and this would be the case in any civilised part of the world that is not beset by fascist power hungry malicious dictators or Warlords who just arrest people who teach God's name as the ''I Am'' where God says ''I am that I am'' and understanding this is the clearing away of all of the names and titles that beset us and is in essence religion itself or, better yet, it is worship since like most things, friend, I am nothing and then the Lord says pick up your cross and deny yourself and follow me. This need for proof as to the guilty mind and also of a foul act of deliberate or reckless behavior is the essence of our criminal law and this is what they teach you in law school with various codified situations that old men have meditated upon for a very long time to work out a balance and a fulcrum that keeps McDonalds safe any where in the world along with the 7 Star Hotel and your luggage on your flight back home to paradise. It keeps you safe as well since you must have a receipt for the coffee, muffin and the Big Mac. Three years of meditation on these issues turns the study into music with principles turned into chords and crescendos when a situation sounds like a Contract dispute and another situation sounds like a Tort case and another situation sounds like something falling somewhere in between Contract and Trust law such as the Quistclose Trust and I will sit at the back as Co litigator, you will be the Lead Litigator and the file will cost only a ''smalls'' for now with the work being done by who does the work at the back and there is no need for me to come to Court unless somebody can't read the typing and why would that happen? But, it has to be done by a willing human being since, the first rule of the pirate is ransom and that is also understood as the Error and omissions obligation. There has to be something that will promote the fear of death and life in the heart of the potentially helpful law graduate who could lie to you and get away with it if you don't know the difference. Machines are machines but a human being in a machine is a creative being and could creatively decide not to answer at all and why should he when he is nothing to lose or gain by helping you but I suppose you think he would help for the honor. What honor is there if you killed him? Why would anyone tell you the truth if you already took his freedom to live and to enjoy life? Why would he tell you the truth? Maybe you can find a willing Yale graduate who is 170 years old who wants to be a machine but for $60,000.00 per year as a private stipend or retainer, I am sure the graduate will read through the muck and maybe even help police authorities develop air tight cases so people can't just walk due to rights violations. With the $60,000.00 he or she will buy a Kia or a tiny GM Vehicle and get on with life. Hear the Lead when he reads the solution in Court as typed by the file processor since somebody has to go through the muck to find the Golden thread and we do the work. Please see following: Sankey's judgment in Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462 is famous for iterating the duty inherent on the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In pertinent part, his judgment stated: Throughout the web of the English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen – that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt subject to what I have already said as to the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception... This judgment is usually referred to as the "golden thread". These principles find their origin in our ancient law as the stems of the ten commandments in various re applications of those foundational principles since my house is your house if you come as a guest but you can't just kill, steal and destroy or else we will be at war and your crops and livestock are yours and they are capable of suffering theft and if so, it is an offense that we mutually and collectively disdain so that we might have peace and it is not a question that is being imposed on us from a far away land. It is your own native law and this is what you must see. The language is the issue but the raw principle is yours and you should not exclude yourself but invite yourself when some part of your dna must or maybe it could find some root in the history and in the people that wrote these principles down even if it is only the Roman or the African Roman or the African since Jacob's Indigenous, Nomadic Israel received a culture from Egypt rather evidently. The question is why would you think that you could be in that particular home ? Why do you think that you only have to show more force or willingness to occupy it or more association to what bum since you already had a court date and convicted for Theft over but you went back to the same address with the intention to what next; kill the owner? Now, with every legal matter there will be a final answer and that answer can be known and understood before you get into the court since you can't say ''...I just thought that it would be...and that I believe that you could because of tv.'' What cases are relevant? What principles are relevant since is it not written? Now, the indigenous population in North America owns trillions of dollars of property and so do the West Indians. This is protected by law. The English legal principles constitute the laws that protect these lands in both the foundational English principles and the re application in the immediate jurisdiction. The resentment, the resistance and the lack of reception to the system of laws is endemic simply because there is an ancestral hurt or preemption of a sense of personal and cultural suffocation that brings a knee jerk sense of revolt to that ''foreign'' and ''far away'' authority telling you how to live your life on Cosmic Beach in Negril or in Hopetario since it feels like an imposition although McDonalds could not exist without these laws and the intention of these laws crafted in the realm of St. Magnus in 1116 is to protect you in and outside of your home always and also to protect your luggage to and from that island paradise where you buy Nikes, Audis and Coca Cola quite a lot these days and you want to be able to enjoy this safety and quiet so how do we sit down and learn these laws while not suffocating in a sense of cultural extermination as we read about Carlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball or as we read Chapelton and Berry? We need to see what besets us and it is to find our story in the story and your mind is telling you that you are not Black Irish while there are many Black people born in Ireland who were exported to the West Indies before and after slavery and many West Indians at some stage have returned to Ireland, Scotland and the UK with a continual interchange and intermingling of the population. But, you could be a West Indian with a dna that needs an acknowledgement of its foundational root before it will function in the world; an acknowledgement or else settling down to learn anything in a structured environment if it is not the ancestral environment is difficult and you could be that Japanese dna from a the year 1600 when an expeditionary force settled in Jamaica before the English came in greater numbers. If you are that dna, it may help if you imagine yourself learning for Japan and that the school your are sitting in is an English School in Japan and that as the English are in Japan, the Japanese can learn about the English in England or in other Anglo territories since we share foods, sports and global technological culture. Japanese headship is what you are looking to acknowledge in yourself. It is ancestral. Once you do, purpose in learning and ancestral honoring ignites. There is no question about ability and the real difference between a Grade 1 student who succeeds and the grade 1 student who is held back is submission. When you turn 18 years old, your need for submission to succeed in structured school environments does not change when, in spite of your West Indian girth and machismo , who is teaching whom... for the exams at least? There is much to understand and what drug says you will rely on the all other world populations to ensure there is sufficient product safety as required by legislation and as defended in Tort law principles seen in the seminal case of Donoghue and Stevenson? You need to understand these principles. You need to understand something before you open your mouth and give advice since negligent advice is a litigious issue with tortious liability. See the case of Junior Books vs. Vetchi and Hedley Byrne vs. Heller since these laws govern that beautiful airport in Kingston Jamaica and that beautiful hotel...all the beautiful hotels and the food also. There is no need for a facade of unqualified and inexperienced people in the legal system who are exterminated by a guttural emotion of resistance and resentment against a foreign rulership that you would wish would just leave you alone so that you could just not only self govern but feel your self governorship and what is the law governing the airport in Africa or in Japan? What is the law governing the safety of property and person. See R v. Palmer for more. The issue is that for many years, the population has unwittingly killed many lawyers who were qualified and they even tried to turn Marcus Garvey into a machine as he finished at Oxford with a ''Second Class'' degree classification which is quite good. But, he faked his death with the help of an older West Indian who was 170 years old from the Bahamas where they blew up a boat and then Marcus took on a new identity and built the Court house you see today in Downtown Kingston. So, you would lose ten lawyers and end up with one facade or a few facades who are financed and big and this may not be a bad idea since it can work for the community to ensure the skilled workers are financed who outsource to the facade and the sums are reasonable since somebody has to do the work and your cologne is of no relevance to the Judge and nor is your girth really but you thought that is what is happening in Manhattan and Toronto so you got a penis extension but the only thing that matters is the list of cases that demonstrate there is no evidence to satisfy the Crown's onus or if there is some evidence, what credible defense can your client be afforded on this fact scenario? Why did he pick up a large cooking knife at the back of the restaurant and walk with it in the alley toward some onlookers who worked in the Kebab shop down the way? Why was he in the alley when the police were called about a man in an alley with a large cooking knife? Maybe he is just a cook at the Jamaican takeout or a Neighborhood watch officer and the knife was old and ready for disposal. So, do sit down Mr.....? What did you say your name is? We are soo pleased you could join us. Pop the champagne and then we eat!!

Post a Comment
Image

Comedy for ELT - Teaching Young Learners

Post a Comment
Image

The Sunday Mass - 33rd Sunday Ordinary Time - November 18, 2018

Post a Comment
Image

The Sunday Mass - 33rd Sunday Ordinary Time - November 18, 2018

Post a Comment
Image

RoboCop (2014) - Operation Freedom Tehran (1080p) FULL HD

Post a Comment
Image
Post a Comment
Image

Sunday Mass for November 11, 2018

Post a Comment

Herod was a foreigner to the laws of Israel and civilization but what if Jesus was an adviser to Herod via secret notes delivered by Nicodemus..? What if stealing the Roman's disbursements intended for the people in America was just economic small pox and Israel ended up desolate under President...I mean Herod? The absence of basic income is economic small pox.

Post a Comment
Image

Selling a New Ford in 1950!...Beaver's Dad (Ward Cleaver) is Smooth as S...

Post a Comment
Image

Londinium(TM) Watch. www.londinium.mmxi.wixsite.com/londiniumgear

Post a Comment
Image

Angel Ronan Greenfield Urban (TM) LAW FIRM MEDIUM WWW.ANGELRONANGREENFIE...

Post a Comment
Image

Angel Ronan Greenfield Urban (TM) LAW FIRM MEDIUM WWW.ANGELRONANGREENFIE...

Post a Comment
Image

November 4, 2018 "Truth on Trial" Rev. Dr. Howard-John Wesley

Post a Comment
Image

Why nations fail | James Robinson | TEDxAcademy

Post a Comment
Image

31st Sunday in Ordinary Time - Mass, 4th November 2018

Post a Comment
Image

LOONEY TUNES (Looney Toons): Prest-O Change-O (1939) [ULTRA HD 4K Cartoo...

Post a Comment