Search This Blog
The Family Ark Magazine(TM) is a trademark owned by Warren A. Lyon; a graduate of U. of L. Raphac Le El Shaddai. Submit to God. Shekinah. HG 1-619-967-5405. Email: info.angelRonan@mail.com.
Posts
Showing posts from May, 2018
Basic income - Free money - VPRO documentary - 2014
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
I know there is a highway in Africa which is just as fun as the 401! I know there is a highway in Manitoba which is just as fun as the 401? Yes mate!
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Driving In Paris & Suburbs - A day at work
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Driving In Paris & Suburbs - A day at work
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Driving In Paris & Suburbs - A day at work
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Driving In Paris & Suburbs - A day at work
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Driving In Paris & Suburbs - A day at work
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Driving In Paris & Suburbs - A day at work
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Hey Lee-Ann Archer. Thank you for your appreciation!
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
In 1772, the groundbreaking legal case Somerset v Stewart swept away all legal justification for slavery within England. No law allowed a master to use compulsion against his so-called slaves. Lord Mansfield's judgement was comparatively dry and technical, but the poet William Cowper later expressed it more eloquently: Slaves cannot breathe in England; if their lungs Receive our air, that moment they are free: They touch our country and their shackles fall The Somerset case sent shockwaves through the English-speaking world. Two years later in 1774 a similar case, Knight v Wedderburn, was brought in Scotland; and soon established that slavery was not legal in Scotland either, just as it was not legal in England. Newspapers in the Thirteen Colonies brought news of the judgement there, and it caused great alarm. The British government in Westminster was already seeking to extend centralised control, with its Stamp Act and other much-disliked measures. If slavery was legal in America but illegal in England, how soon would it be before Westminster tried to apply the same law in both places? Worse still, how long before the slaves themselves started to get unwelcome ideas about freedom? In January 1773, the slaves of Massachusetts sent a petition to the General Court asking for relief from their 'unhappy state and condition' — the first of five such measures. By September of that year, a Virginia slave owner advertising in the newspaper for help recapturing two runaway slaves, noted with exasperation that they "will endeavour to get out of the Colony, particularly to Britain, where they imagine they will be free (a notion now too prevalent among the Negroes, greatly to the Vexation and Prejudice of their Masters)". A year later another advertisement for a runaway in Georgia said specifically that he would probably "attempt to get on board some Vessel bound for Great Britain, from the Knowledge he has of the late Determination of Somerset's Case". In September 1774 Abigail Adams wrote to her husband that a 'conspiracy of the Negroes' had just been discovered, by which they offered to form a militia to support the British royal governor in Massachusetts if he would promise them their freedom and give them weapons. In 1775, as unrest gathered. the governor of Virginia Lord Dunmore actually went ahead and formed a regiment of ‘Ethiopians’, promising freedom to the former slaves of rebels who escaped from their masters. If even illiterate slaves in the Deep South knew about Somerset's Case and were using it as a justification for escape — or worse, perhaps for rebellion — then this was clearly a crisis for American slaveowners. It might not be enough in itself to provoke rebellion, but it was another straw on the camel's back. When the Declaration of Independence was written, one of the main charges levelled against King George was that "He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us" — by offering the hope of freedom to the slaves. 3.1k Views · View Upvoters Related QuestionsMore Answers Below How do they teach the American Revolution in the U.K.? If the British won the American Revolutionary War, would slavery in America have lasted as long as it did? How important was slavery as an issue in the American War of Independence? What percentage of people in America owned slaves at the peak of slavery? Why did the United States lose the Vietnam War? Ask New Question Kiani Francis Kiani Francis, works at Glasgow Answered Jul 20 2016 · Upvoted by Carrington Ward, Ph.D Diplomatic History & History of the United States of America (2008) · Author has 545 answers and 610.8k answer views The British declared the rebels to be traitors & thus their property was forfeited including their slaves (George Washington owned 318). Consequently many black soldiers joined the British Army. Later many ran away to join the Royal Marines. When the British lost the black Loyalists settled in Saskatchewan & many came to London & took English wives. Slavery was abolished in the British Empire in 1833 & in the USA after the Civil war in 1865. The Somerset Case in 1772 declared slavery illegal in England (& that it had NEVER been legal since the Statute of Westminster 1101), after a public anti slavery campaign led by Granville Sharp. So it would certainly have been a logical move for Washington, Jefferson & the other slave owners to rebel & for their slaves to fight for Britain. In fact one of Washington's slaves called Henry Washington actually did run away to fight for Britain. Similarly Native Americans were consistently better treated by the British & Canadians than by the USA. 421 Views · View Upvoters Daniel Baker Daniel Baker, M.A. in European History, George Mason University Answered Jul 20 2016 · Upvoted by Carrington Ward, Ph.D Diplomatic History & History of the United States of America (2008) · Author has 1.8k answers and 2.8m answer views There was no reason to believe in the 1770s that Britain would outlaw slavery at any time in the foreseeable future. Although the continental slave owners weren’t represented in Parliament, the fabulously wealthy sugar planters of Barbados, Jamaica, Antigua, and other British colonies in the Caribbean were very well represented, since many of them were absentee landowners who lived in Britain. Those sugar planters depended on slavery, and nobody expected them to let an abolition bill get through Parliament. And indeed they did successfully defend slavery in Parliament, right down to 1832 and the Reform Act which cost the nobility much of their influence and allowed abolition to finally pass the next year. But nobody could have foreseen the Reform Act in the 1770s. In any case, the main hotbed of revolution in America was Massachusetts, where slavery barely existed. Even in the more slavery-dependent South, many of the planters had imbibed Enlightenment-era ideas and saw slavery as a necessary evil that they hoped to get rid of, once they figured out a way to do it without losing their wealthy position. Unfortunately, that attitude would begin to change rapidly after the introduction of the cotton gin in 1793, but that was long after the War of Independence. Ultimately, slavery wasn’t much of an issue either way in the Revolution; many slave owners were loyalists, like Joseph Brant and James Chalmers, while some, like Washington and Jefferson, joined the revolutionaries. 624 Views · View Upvoters Sara Matthews Sara Matthews, Teacher/Student American history, American literature and ELL Answered Jul 22 2016 · Author has 10.4k answers and 3.7m answer views As Joseph Boyle points out - it wasn't given as a reason and one might think there'd be some hint of it along the way. The impact of Somerset v. Stewart was to create an anti-slavery movement in England but this is occurring after the Revolution - over in 1781. Cowper writes his poem in 1785 and in 1776 slavery is alive and thriving in the British empire if not on English soil - and powerful voices in England support slavery in the Empire as they were indeed owners of slaves in the Caribbean. Prior to the Revolution - roughly 2% of Massachusetts' population were slaves in contrast to 40% of Virginia's population. The two hotbeds of revolution were Massachusetts - where slavery barely existed - and then Virginia - though Virginia was hardly the only slave-owning colony. Virginia's planters were tobacco planters and heavily in debt to British merchants and struggling with low tobacco prices sources suggest their letters and thoughts are consumed with that worry - their debts being called in and having no way to pay them. 409 Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Daniel Baker Joseph Boyle Joseph Boyle Answered Jul 21 2016 · Author has 25.2k answers and 18.1m answer views Somerset v Stewart says some historians believe “the case contributed to increasing colonial support for separatism…, by parties on both sides of the slavery question” and “some individuals in pro-slavery and anti-slavery colonies, for opposite reasons, desired a distinct break from English law in order to achieve their goals with regard to slavery”. By 1784, 3 of the 4 largest Northern states had abolished slavery. If the Somerset decision caused fears among slaveholders, they did not list this as their reason to revolt and neither did the British state abolition as a goal. If the planters’ only desire was to keep slaves working their plantations, they would have done much better not to revolt and just continue as the West Indies did for another 60+ years, by which time the Northern states had turned against slavery in the South. 684 Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Daniel Baker Douglas C. Miller Douglas C. Miller, I have been reading history for over 50 years Answered Jul 23 2016 · Author has 1k answers and 577.2k answer views Several of the answers here affirm the proposition that a threat that Britain might try to ban slavery was a significant motivation for the revolution. This is essentially an economic argument and there have been other interpretations claiming economic motives as the primary cause of the revolution. I think this is too simple; economists or economic historians like to make economic motivations the primary ones for many historical events but they ignore other powerful motivations. While New England may have been a key player in the slave trade Sam Adams and his ilk were mostly not rich ship owners or builders and did not depend on the slave trade for their livelihood. Parliamentary arrogance in imposing taxes where none had previously existed produced political motives for rebellion, overshadowing economic ones. The s is true of John Adams and middle class attorneys and other professionals like him as well. Ben Franklin was not involved in the slavezs trade as well. I think one can't rule out some small role for this issue in helping along the revolution, but I can't see it as primary or even close at all. 412 Views · View Upvoters · Answer requested by Daniel Baker Chris Marciano Chris Marciano, US citizen Answered Jul 20 2016 · Author has 131 answers and 44.2k answer views Not at all. An early draft of the Declaration said that George III was responsible for "the sin of slavery." Many founding fathers hated slavery, but left it out in order to unify the colonies. South Carolina was a hold out in voting for independence.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Automation is a good thing but it affects all world populations like a canqcer. Some populations thrive. Some cultures thrive as they respected the one deal that societies as composed for the people and by the people must make with automation technology that celebrates human value. That deal is basic income at $13200.00 per year for every citizen of the West Indies. If you have citizenship in Japan also as a dual citizen, you will only get the higher basic income from the two locales. Without it, there is population depletion and a desertification as less spending power in the average person's immediacy causes a Main Street slow down in sales per day while crimes in the economics of desperation goes up causing what Baudrilard calls the desert of the real. By Warren A. Lyon, UWO, U of London, BPP University.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Sunday Mass - Pentecost - May 20, 2018
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Androidification of the human being means that we have overcome any discussion among humans about human value or their usefulness as a market for consumer products manufactured by machines. Remember that the Triangle was taught in Europe first by people who lived and dwelt in Africa first. The Triangle was taught in the new world by people who taught in Spanish; not in English. This is not a big deal; not a big deal at all. But, do what suits you. Marry for practicality and less for the highly promoted notions of love. Marry for what contents you. She is beautiful; no? She is Black and comely and you are related to Israel. The issue is that coffee makers and washing machines is what we are. If your appliance breaks down and does not function according to reasonable specification in your life long commitment, then do not panic. There is another one available but you should not abuse the coffee maker with unreasonable expectations as to showing up five minutes early or not more than 5 minutes late as these are traps in Cosmopolitan for a fast divorce when you should show one to another the mercy and kindness you seek for yourself in relationship and most importantly, forgive the Pho disease she gave you after her lunch with old school friends at a Pho Noodle Restaurant and she will forgive the funny toes she got after eating the Quaker Harvest Crunch or that you ate five hours before you copulated.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Argent Base Gladiator - Initial Battle Scene basic income is the sword so that you might eat the oats, the bacon and buy Irish Spring!
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The issue is a Black White bond in a dependency in a dance to the self extermination in a dying need for identity yet beige and brown are more helpful, purposeful ubiquitous concepts for Descriptive purposes in saving the mocking bird from his mockery in the absence of decisiveness to fully absorb a strong umbrella culture that provides self esteem in trois ou cinq ou sept verre de pepsi since without any education, you are just monkey see monkey do as media addicts, hoping to emulate the most assertive male or female figures you see and really this is what you may see in your House of Representatives and the Congress with individuals who are in office but under prepared to speak and say what they were required to have calculated as far as 2 for 1 in France is better than 1 for $1.00 or human life in France without formal education or just high school at $80,000.00 euros per year for basic income in an automated economy is better than self hatred for the majority of citizens enduring life in the North America at zero basic income but you could have authority to take your risk at the bank window with some sympathy for what is not being done by your wiser elected and capable while Heat (1995) is not economic policy ; a definitive sense of identity where the more definitiveness of any culture adopted or that is ubiquitous in the more central aspects of your life fills the vacuum but your raggedy vacuous culture will still fall apart along with your country if you dont respect the simplest animalian cultural equation of family. All animals do it but a cat or dog in a city has been dissociated from its nature and could live with anyone who would feed it but above the tree line with few people, it chooses survival which may mean a family of wolves but family. The issue is the need that white has for black but with black beneath it; not African,Jewish,Egyptian, and equal or above it. Next, the diffidence to know anything other than hunt and gather or hunt, blockade, ransom and pirate which says your white culture determining its right to piracy in the determined self induced under education which becomes a determined independence but which is really a dependency on other producing and formative cultures in terms of technology in relation to the world's receiving, less technologically advanced late arrival cultures who do not see law as technology while they worship the microwave and school attendance went down in much of the West Indies once the microwave became available the murder of formally educated people went up in the region and these facts do not deny your manual dexterity but it does demonstrate a consistent presumption to just take what you want or need when you cannot understand how to do it on your own(like buy a house) and you seem to want to kill a black; I mean a brown guy who cannot understand how the train driver patted him on the head when he was taking the bus or train to school but who seems shocked to see the same kid four months after graduation day in a Mcdonald's manager's uniform where the White or Black train driver manager's eyes say 'who do you think you will be?' and the Brown guy says '...You told me I would be dead if I did not show my humility so how is he not every under-educated train (under educated as a matter of personal choice) driver's son so now all Afro hair people now call themselves Samoan Amerindian or African or African Amerindian since every one in the Eastern hemisphere pitys the fool; the fool that is the Western hemisphere. Either way, basic income was economically mandatory as of 1936 and FDR is our socio-economic hero as he saw the economic proofs that we must now hold to be self-evident as he implemented the policy but he was put into a war contrary to his intentions for an independent and thriving America although isolated from the jealousy and rape of the Herodians who brought their Masters and Johnson with Playboy shortly after raping America's self sufficiency that was evident before the war and continually thereafter with a leadership hired in its insufficiency to solve the equations while they have the FDR blue print so who is the fool; the fool or the fool who follows it? It seems this need you have for black with your white in a world where you used to say Yes Massah or ' Yes Sah' as much as a Brown dude is quite evident but where sometimes the people sitting with the 'Sah' as a friend or as the 'Sah' where just as brown as some of the brown people saying 'sah' with you. Let me get my Renault Megane. I'll be right back. Now, de point is what are you askin? What are you aftah since I can't...I just can't undastand how you don't undastand automation and human value? The human being is the market. They are not threatening YOU if they eat. You will see that you asked Asians to buy Marks and Spencer good at twice the value while I would buy it in Vermont or Saskainnesota. But, you would rather believe every Asian is working full time when every Asian has at least some basic income like every European EU citizen and this is what I would say is a good idea since the Irish parliament has devolved and has taken humane course with basic income. The Scottish parliament has done the same with basic income. The Welsh may be willing to stay with you, the fishing boat captain from the Bahamas or Jamaica who resents his son knowing how to calculate all the information necessary at a traffic light accident during grade 10 physics class but study the world in negative causality before you put in a test toward positive causality while I buy a lot of Meji chocolate and Hi Chew candies in Saskatoba until you and the few undignified pirate commonwealth territories are all Asian in your diffidence against logic but then why not give yourself what you want; a principality like Monaco right in the centre of South Anglo at Winse-dsor or Buckstop or maybe on sabbatical in Reims since you are really a French Real Family but not a pirate Jamaica family and you can stay in Londres as often as you want or at Winse-dsor for as long as you want since you and I love Anglo culture and Ambrosia's custard and you and I think every Euro Anglo or Southern Western Hemispheric Anglo in any commonwealth country is worth $70,000 usd Equivalent in basic income per year as we move around and work in the various commonwealth countries to honor and celebrate our Royal family or Real familia ? Let the English people around you come to visit Green Park and will stand at the gates of the Palace designated for Sharon Gorgeton. The Japanese will also come as tourists with their hegemony in their human self love at $70,000.000 usd equivalent in basic income and see the processions of horses and swords and the English will throw more flowers purchased with their....I am not sure it seems but maybe it is the 5000 pounds family money per year. I will come! You are the....'do unto others as they would do unto you' family and we will buy more Mini Coopers and more Tunnock's Candies. But, if you want to join peace then you could take the sacrament that has the peace you are looking for, the update and the enhancement. You have to drink tea to fuel it and the chip you are looking for is in a Ritz Cracker, the chips a hoy or maybe that small frozen mackerel. It feels like a small rice grain but you will not choke on a bone. Don't run too fast now at track practice. Boil it and then eat it with mustard or pasta sauce. Do not gut the fish. So Dillinger would tell you to call your governor and tell him to use his executive powers to put in basic income at the state level for at least $40,000.00 per month basic income while the President can use his executive powers to put in another $40,000.00. Basic income is like a pool; a necessary lottery ticket where your return on many sales tax contributions across the average shopping day amongst the living activities of every human, every human family and every business entity; large or small is averaged out to ensure there is an average and sufficient amount of monies in every individual's hands to ensure a sufficient and average amount of consumption to ensure your economy expands and does not contract as with contraction, the buildings become empty, the neighborhoods become empty and the towns die. The governor in his day in Minnesota turned out to be his cousin. About feeling like a King which is what you want whether or not every body was white as you say you would still want to feel it that is really your pirate dna asking for expression, you could pick acorns which is not really illegal now but it will be made illegal since you say you just really want to feel above the law. The issue is that in the love of America or Latin America as all human life matters and maybe to content those sick in Black and White but to benefit the one nation under God as we have all been victims, it seems the Brown people would content our national peace as ministers and servants of Shem and Japheth at 10 % less than the average citizen's basic income since for the love of God, it is not a sin to save a donkey or a nation that fell into the pit of black and white on the Sabbath but we do not want people who are Brown to have too much honor or authority in that they are willing to lay down 10% of their life but...we don't know what you are asking Doomo: doomo arigato gozaimasu.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The Sunday Mass - Ascension of the Lord - May 13, 2018
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Cheddar Man: DNA shows early Briton had dark skin - BBC News
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Epilogue to the Concept of Human Nature According to God and John Locke! The last test in this new information driven world full of connectivity is based on Rousseau's political writings as seen in the first chapter of the Social contract. The real issue after any Oath of Agreement best understood as the Oath of engagement 1649 is how to martial humanity and confirm human value in the finest hour or final hour with the basic income to facilitate community and safety and stave off of the Economics of Desperation as discussed proudly as America's solution to automation in movies like Traffic (2000) and in the movie Heat(1995) where they discuss the government's money at gun point as a crew or terrorist cell or as discussed glamorously in Layer Cake(2004) or as seen in Getaway(1972) and as also discussed in the Ozark Netflix series and Killing them Softly(2015) while it is best to commit to the domestic tranquility and to commit to mutual preservation in spite of what power any one man or woman could exercise to resist with guns the power of another man building his own brand or in resisting any female figure skater who is humbly and faithfully trying to win an honest competition. Click here to read more!
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Persil Super Bowl Commercial 2018 Game-Time Stain-Time
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Persil Super Bowl Commercial 2018 Teasers Peter Hermann
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Hearts v Celtic 1-3 | Highlights & All Goals | Scottish Premiership
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Plagiarize or borrow this but I am not sure what your lecturer or school teacher will say if you hand it in Would it help you feel better if you could hand it in as your own? Would you want to hand it in as your own if you did not watch what does not fit the Key of Disney circa 1939-1955 as an example?: The discussion about John Locke's justification of slavery as presented in the essay Concept of Human Nature According to God and John Locke by Warren A, Lyon( a graduate of the University of Western, Ontario who recently completed a senior Political Economy course with Oxford; November 2017) discloses an unusual popularity among the essay plagiarizer community over the last 20 or more years. It would be similar to plagiarizing a book written about Catholicism and Christianity.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps